Last edited by a moderator:
Have you talked to him? I seriously doubt he's already planning a TDL move in his head.
Let me paint you a picture: TDL time, Sabres out of the playoffs by 5 points and things aren't looking all that great. But Eichel and Hall have been on fire and Hall is on a pace for a 100 point season.
1) Hall can ride the season out with his buddy Jack and keep things going offensively, down the stretch is some of the best time to play loose offensive hockey if you're out of it. You could still also make the playoffs with a strong finish with a team you've been invested in for months to justify your decision even if its not looking likely. Move to Boston or something could be on the table, but on the other hand you don't know how the fit is going to be over there and on a personal level you risk a disappointing finish to a season that could've otherwise been a monster year with that next contract in mind.
2) Adams could shop Hall, but at the same time he loses his leverage of trying to keep him long-term. And even if he does decide to put him out there, does Hall accept a trade to the team that gives the Sabres the type of return Adams feels is enough to justify losing that leverage i mentioned?
The way i see it, this is way more complicated than just saying "oh, he's just gonna get traded". It's always an option as a last resort if things don't work out at all of course, but you get the point.
What kind of money could he have gotten long-term? Probably not much or he'd have taken it. So I don't think it is so much banking on that as the situation nearly necessitating it. Almost every deal signed this off-season has not been long-term.anybody else think it's unwise for a player with his injury history to bank on one season of racking up enough points to earn a fat retirement contract?
If the NHLPA puts pressure on players to take ''market value'' dollars, the NHLPA should be dissolved immediately.I wonder if pressure from NHLPA for contract $ is still an issue. I remember reading lots and lots of articles about that over the years and that could've also helped influence his decision. If a... well, let's face it, he's a star with a superstar season under his belt... signs for the 6.5m (a 500k raise 6 years later when he's outperformed his contract and cap has risen) then what sort of implications do the NHLPA tell him and his agent it'd have?
I still think this move isn't as dumb as people think but I wonder if that was a factor at all.
"I think, honestly, it's probably all winning," the Arizona Coyotes forward said Friday when asked what was most important.Didn't he want to sign for a contending team?
Gambling on what?Guys gambling on himself. Love it.
Think the TDL thing is real. Makes sense for Hall and Buffalo as a plan B. Or he just goes off playing with Eichel and they have a decent year.
A lot of points. Cap going up. Get a nice long term contract.Gambling on what?
You don't seem to get it. He didn't want to win. He wanted a place to prop HIS stats up for next year.Rumour has it Sakic offered him 1 year with a $6.5M AAV.
If this is true he needs to fire his agent. He'd be a great fit on Colorado, he would've been surrounded by better players and he would've had a very good chance of winning the cup.
I don't know why so many need to provide convoluted or maximal motivations to his choice.
He has a NMC and a NTC.This makes sense for Hall. If no top contender has space right now, they might at the deadline.
And the best way to make sure you are available at the TDL is to sign with Buffalo.
Why wouldn't he have propped his stats up in Colorado? As if he wouldn't get a ton of playing time and some alchemy of elite linemates/lesser competition.You don't seem to get it. He didn't want to win. He wanted a place to prop HIS stats up for next year.