The present moment isn't a nightmare scenario? Sometimes the cure, as they say, is worse than the disease.So Buffalo gets rid of 3 1st round picks. Eichel leaves and Buffalo watches their top picks go to Seattle year after year? Sounds like a nightmare scenario.
Or a rough equivalent of 3 first round choices. That could be a mix of seconds, prospects, players, pucks, whatever.So Buffalo gets rid of 3 1st round picks. Eichel leaves and Buffalo watches their top picks go to Seattle year after year? Sounds like a nightmare scenario.
That's not how the OP offer went. It was 3 first round picks.Or a rough equivalent of 3 first round choices. That could be a mix of seconds, prospects, players, pucks, whatever.
I know but I think the OP was based on something I posted earlier.That's not how the OP offer went. It was 3 first round picks.
This is a joke right?What about Seattle takes Rasmus Dahlin and Jeff Skinner. Buffalo saves huge money and loses one quality defender on a decline. Seattle bets on Dahlin and Skinner rebounding.
Based on something that I saw on HFBoards.
Let's say that Seattle assumes that Vegas 2.0 is impossible due to teams not willing to give high quality "win now" pieces after what happened 5 years ago so Seattle wants to build patiently.
Here come the Sabres and offer this to end Skinner fiasco:
BUF 1st 2021 + BUF 1st 2022 + BUF 1st 2023 + Jeff Skinner
for
future considerations/whatever
Originally, I thought about adding Cozens here but prime Cozens fits Eichel's prime better than those picks.
Who says no in this scenario?
Buffalo says no. Easily.Based on something that I saw on HFBoards.
Let's say that Seattle assumes that Vegas 2.0 is impossible due to teams not willing to give high quality "win now" pieces after what happened 5 years ago so Seattle wants to build patiently.
Here come the Sabres and offer this to end Skinner fiasco:
BUF 1st 2021 + BUF 1st 2022 + BUF 1st 2023 + Jeff Skinner
for
future considerations/whatever
Originally, I thought about adding Cozens here but prime Cozens fits Eichel's prime better than those picks.
Who says no in this scenario?
Checked the buyout calculator and you're probably right:
View attachment 402380
So based on that, the value is more along the two 1sts, not three.
How is it a great comparison? Toronto had to trade Marleau to open up enough cap space to sign Marner, Carolina basically had them over a barrelThe Marleau trade is a great comparison. If Buffalo ownership wants to throw $54 million down the drain then they can have at it. If they want to get rid of their problem they have to pay up and in today's NHL that is not going to be cheap.
He'd probably score forty for any decent coach.You just know Skinner would score 40 in his first season with Seattle