right so i was arguing on the other side. Eichel gets a point for being a center. Pastrnak gets a point for being more durable over the last 5 years. Pastrnak gets a point for scoring more points over the last 5 years. Pastrnak gets a point for having a contract thats 3.5 million cheaper. 3-1 pastrnak. So i think the difference in value between pastrnak and eichel is worth something, not quite reinhart on its own. So a reclamation project 23 year old former 25 goal scorer and a bottom 6 energy guy center with some potential as well to me made up the difference.
eichel and pastrnak are close but id never go 1-1. (Mostly contract, durability, and production related) though. Athough eichel does take face offs so that might be a wash to sabres fans?
I agree with bolded. Reinhart is better. Debrusk + frederic for reinhart bad deal for buffalo.
I understand why that contract is viewed as a plus for most, but not to the Sabres. What do you think is more valuable to them, someone on a bargain contract for two more years? Or someone signed long term to a reasonable contract?
pasta being cheaper for the next two years does nothing for the Sabres. We aren’t contending for the cup where a 3.5 mil difference moves any needle. But pasta leaving in two years kills the value. Sabres can’t move eichel and literally have nothing to show for it in two years. A bargain contract helps most teams, not really the Sabres.
Pasta’s contract isn’t a -1 for the Sabres, it’s a giant deal breaker. Adding in that we lose reinhart for two lesser pieces, hopefully you can see why this trade isn’t great for the Sabres. It’s not the value isn’t there in a vacuum, it’s not there for the Sabres who are in a dark dark fragile place lol.
this is not the eichel trade that helps them turn it around in the short term or long term.