Lobstertainment
Oh no, my brains.
both have lived in the Shadows of the Hype created by Ovechkin and Malkin but who is the better prospect?
jas said:Well, since the Rangers didn't draft Malkin, while they still have a VERY good shot at Brule, I'm going to say Brule.
Fighter said:"With the second pick in the 2005 entry draft the New York Islanders are proud to select Gilbert Brule!"
I prefer Malkin right now, but I will look a bit more closely Brule this coming season.
jas said:C'mon, you know you're guaranteed to get the eighth spot in eastern Conference and bow out five games later.
carsonbuddy said:Brule, speed hands and traffic experienced
Jay Thompson said:I have not seen much of Malkin, but take this for what it's worth:
Brule is the best 16/17 year old prospect I've ever seen play in the WHL.
monster_bertuzzi said:Maybe you didn't see them play, but Patrick Marleau, Mike Modano, Jason Bouwmeester, and Joe Sakic were all better 16 year olds than Brule. Still, thats pretty good company!
Sakic didn't play in the WHL as a 16 yr old. He was 17 in his first WHL season in 86-87.monster_bertuzzi said:Maybe you didn't see them play, but Patrick Marleau, Mike Modano, Jason Bouwmeester, and Joe Sakic were all better 16 year olds than Brule. Still, thats pretty good company!
How would you know something like that?Stiffler's Mom said:Brule over Malkin on sheer heart and desire.
Dark Metamorphosis said:How would you know something like that?
Jay Thompson said:I have not seen much of Malkin, but take this for what it's worth:
Brule is the best 16/17 year old prospect I've ever seen play in the WHL.
yeah right....not even close. Brule will be a star but better than Crosby, not a chance.Russian_fanatic said:I also believe Brule will be better than Crosby!