Proposal: Bruins Knights

Big Daddy Cane

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 8, 2010
13,379
32,023
Western PA
What does Vegas get out this? Tuch for Debrusk is maybe a step sideways in player quality, but a step backwards in terms of contracts. Moore is arguably a negative value asset with his contract term. Reaves could return an asset, albeit middling, at the deadline; Frederic is a B-prospect that really doesn't address anything.

If Tuch gets traded, a young, legit Top 4 D that has equivalent team control or a leaguewide high-end defensive prospect is coming back the other way. There's no reason for Vegas to trade him otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CupInSIX

bbfan419

Registered User
Jul 3, 2006
8,940
9,394
Moncton NB
What does Vegas get out this? Tuch for Debrusk is maybe a step sideways in player quality, but a step backwards in terms of contracts. Moore is arguably a negative value asset with his contract term. Reaves could return an asset, albeit middling, at the deadline; Frederic is a B-prospect that really doesn't address anything.

If Tuch gets traded, a young, legit Top 4 D that has equivalent team control or a leaguewide high-end defensive prospect is coming back the other way. There's no reason for Vegas to trade him otherwise.
Would Matt Grzelcyk be of interest to Vegas?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad