True but if there is any kind of luxury tax or revenue sharing then it has to be accompanied by some kind of salary floor. Otherwise the rich teams are just putting money into the poor owner's pockets instead of into the poor owner's teams.go kim johnsson said:I have a huge issue with all teams must have a total salary between $33 and $38 million? What? This would be Joe Banner's dream job. I understand his taxing on it, but that is a narrow window....
go kim johnsson said:Now if he could explain all of that....
go kim johnsson said:I have a huge issue with all teams must have a total salary between $33 and $38 million? What? This would be Joe Banner's dream job. I understand his taxing on it, but that is a narrow window....
3. Escrow:
Seven per cent of player payroll
Ten per cent of designated hockey revenue (DHR)
Arena construction fund
4. Revenue sharing of $200 million with $75 million from playoff pool
5. Set payroll threshold at 38 million and payroll minimum at 33 million
8. Guarantee players 55 per cent of DHR
CREW99AW said:the part I didn't like was lowering the ufa age to 29,but I guess that's probably a key point for the nhlpa.
chriss_co said:Whats funny is that everyone on the planet not working for the owners or the player's union can agree on what the CBA should be.. why can't they!?
Well since others here have expressed the same concerns, that team's shouldnt be forced to spend money if they want to develop their players, then I propose the following simple solution:Leafer72 said:I don't like it all, in the NFL they can tax you if a team is too much under the cap