WJC: Bragin Vindicated!!!

Discussion in 'International Tournaments' started by Zine, Jan 6, 2011.

View Users: View Users
  1. Zine

    Zine Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    10,828
    Likes Received:
    160
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    Rostov-on-Don
    Despite what North American media/fans said about the lack of Russian CHLers, Russia's performance proved why Bragin's roster selection was the right choice --- experience and maturity.

    Russia would've been led offensively by Tarasenko, Kuznetsov, Kitsyn, regardless of what CHLers were there. However, under no circumstance would Russia have won with 2011 eligible Namestnikov, Yakupov, Khokhlachev, etc. in support scoring roles. In addition to talent, Russia won because of the maturity and experience of 1991 born KHL/MHL players. That maturity and experience was painfully evident come crunch time even among the unsung players like Golubev, Dvurechensky, Kalinin, Panarin, etc.

    But its all politics right?:sarcasm:
    Well done Bragin.:handclap::handclap:
     
  2. Alessandro Seren Rosso

    Alessandro Seren Rosso Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2004
    Messages:
    5,676
    Likes Received:
    172
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    Europe
    Home Page:
    Haha well written. I actually wrote the same somewhere in the threads :)
     
  3. Uncle Rotter

    Uncle Rotter Registered User

    Joined:
    May 11, 2010
    Messages:
    10,104
    Likes Received:
    8,273
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Kelowna, B.C.
    Well there was one CHL player of theirs who loomed large in the result
     
  4. MXD

    MXD Original #4

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    40,580
    Likes Received:
    3,545
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Occupation:
    Dead
    ... Canada would probably have led anyways after 2 periods and would probably have started to play that kind of extremely passive game anyways.

    This said, Russia won with their choices. Why bother about the choices they didn't make?

    Not to mention -- why Golubev would have been out if, let say, Nail Yakupov would have been there?!?!?!
     
  5. MaxV

    MaxV Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2006
    Messages:
    4,016
    Likes Received:
    186
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Occupation:
    Electrical Engineer
    Location:
    New York, NY
    It wasn't as much avoiding the CHL players as it was picking the right players for this team.

    In the past, Russian coaches would just fill the roster with as many scorers as they could. As a result, poor fore- and back-checking, as well as crappy defense.

    This year's team was FAR more balanced. Every line had scorers and defensively responsible players.
     
  6. antidotevsk

    antidotevsk Registered User

    Joined:
    May 10, 2009
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    telecommunications
    Location:
    Voskresensk, Russia
    Anyway how could anyone discuss the matches my opinion is that Namestnikov could have helped this team!
    but Russia's team had only one 92 born player Kuznetsov. - it was the Bragins' decision.
     
  7. Kid_Roll

    Kid_Roll Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Messages:
    5,544
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Home Page:
    More this IMO. Otherwise it seems like you are picking and choosing when the "KHL" theory works or not, as the sample sizes for that kind of thing are too small to really make a sound argument out of.
     

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"