Well, the thread title and the question asked in the poll aren't the same question. The question actually asked is if we think Krug is a #1 should we sign him, not if he is.
This isn't directed solely at you, but would we have really signed Krug to be our #1? He would have been our highest paid D, but there is zero reason to start giving him the toughest D assignments just because of that, especially when we would have had Dekeyser and Nemeth also playing his side behind him. He wouldn't have been needed on the PK, either. He wouldn't have needed to see his IT bumped unnecessarily to 25 minutes just because.
Instead, the Wings could have treated him pretty similar to how Boston did. Not to the extent that Boston did, because the Wings just don't get enough ozone starts to tilt Krug's numbers that far, but Blashill still could have picked his spots quite a bit and fed Krug and a ton of PP time.