Toronto is UNQUESTIONABLY better? How has Bergeron missed games this year, the season starts tomorrow for them?Boston lost their #3 C and have no good bottom 6 C's. Bergeron already missed games last year and missed games this year already. Krejci has been declining for a few years now. Tampa and Toronto are unquestionably better teams this year, so I think it's a fair question.
Toronto is UNQUESTIONABLY better? How has Bergeron missed games this year, the season starts tomorrow for them?
They have a bunch of kids who can center that 3rd line and Kuraly is a perfectly acceptable 3rd unit center until they find a better option. I'd bet this 4th line, whoever rotates through this season, is far better than most teams given the depth of talent the Bruins have.
Mostly I just love the 'Toronto is unquestionably better' comment, after the Bruins beat them in the standings last year and had just as young a roster as Toronto with more kids on the way.
Boston is overrated AF for some reason, they barely got through the Leafs who made major blunders in the series, disappearances from Andersen, Matthews, Nylander, God awful coaching decisions from Babcock and Naz being Naz and getting suspended, still needed the final 10 minutes of game 7 to close it out. They then got rekt by Tampa.
Would not be surprised if Florida surpassed them this year, Boston is not in the Toronto or Tampa tier anymore, both teams got better and Boston is relying on a 42 year old to anchor their D and yes Boston has good young players and a stud in Mac, but that's not enough to compete with the primed-prime talent in Toronto and Tampa while they only have effectively one line that can really produce for them.
Boston has the better goaltending, defense, and offense. The margins vary but the Bruins should again be better barring injury issues.
Also ignoring that they had a 112pt season, good enough for 3rd in the NHL...?
Let's also ignore that they had terrible play from Rask/Krejci at times (who also happened to be injured) as well as injures to Carlo/Nash/Bergeron.
Also funny that Matthews/Nylander just "played bad" no credit is given to the Bergeron line for shutting them down.
It really bugs me how much everyone is taking for granted who the top 4 in the Atlantic are this year. Things ALWAYS change from year to year.
NO ONE really saw Boston as a top team at start of last season - more a bubble playoff team. And they had a fantastic season. FLA was so-so most year till they turned it on towards end.
Teams like Mtl, Buffalo Det and even Ottawa could put together a run.
I'll be shocked if the top 4 this year is Tampa, Tor, Boston and FLA in some order. I guarantee at least 1 other team breaks it up.
As to the actual question - I think i'll say Boston. But I could see both teams struggling this year.
Even with that mentality, Buffalo is the only one that has a realistic shot of doing that. Montreal if Price goes god mode, but even than a goalie can only carry a team for so long without D or F support.
Pasta and McAvoy, but also Carlo, Donato, Heinen, DeBrusk. More on the way. The MAJORITY of talent on this team is sub-24 and improving or just starting to contribute. Chara, Krejci, Backes are all on the decline but their roles have all been minimized/picked up by the kids. Marchand is 30, he's like 18 months older than Tavares. I conceded Bergeron, I do think he starts to slow down over the next few years but for this season, it's more than made up for by improvements by the kids imo.I agree that Toronto is definitely not unquestionably better, but the bolded is a bit misleading. There is a difference between complimentary young, and leading the team young. Boston's age comes from Chara, Bergeron, Marchand. Leafs from Marleau, Hainsey, Polak. Although all credit to Pasta and McAvoy.
Pasta and McAvoy, but also Carlo, Donato, Heinen, DeBrusk. More on the way. The MAJORITY of talent on this team is sub-24 and improving or just starting to contribute. Chara, Krejci, Backes are all on the decline but their roles have all been minimized/picked up by the kids. Marchand is 30, he's like 18 months older than Tavares. I conceded Bergeron, I do think he starts to slow down over the next few years but for this season, it's more than made up for by improvements by the kids imo.
That's all fair, I'm fine admitting the Leafs top sub-25 talent trumps the B's. That doesn't mean Bergeron, Marchand etc will stop contributing because they're 30+ though...maybe their long-term outlook isn't as rosy, I'll grant that, but for this season do you really expect a drop-off from those key guys? That's what we're talking about here, isn't it?As much as I respect the talent of Carlo, Donato, Heinen and DeBrusk, they dont have franchise potential. I'd argue some dont even have top line potential. As a Leaf fan I can start naming off young contributors too, but it would be pretty insignficant.
You name the core and look at the ages.
Tavares 28
Matthews 21
Marner 21
Nylander 22
Rielly 24
Andersen 29
Average age: 24.2
vs.
Bergeron 33
Marchand 30
Pastarnak 22
add someone here?
McAvoy 20
Rask 31
Average age: 27.2*
*Only using 5 players skews the average age
Carlo, Donato, Heinen, Debrusk vs. Dermott, Kapanen, Johnson, Brown is more or less a wash with the slight edge going to Boston's players for being more proven.
That's all fair, I'm fine admitting the Leafs top sub-25 talent trumps the B's. That doesn't mean Bergeron, Marchand etc will stop contributing because they're 30+ though...maybe their long-term outlook isn't as rosy, I'll grant that, but for this season do you really expect a drop-off from those key guys? That's what we're talking about here, isn't it?
On another note, don't sleep on Donato. 5 G, 4 A in 12 NHL games, 5 G, 1 A in five OLY games, almost a goal per game and 1.48 PPG in his junior year at Harvard, the kid just scores. He probably won't be an elite talent but he could be a core piece for the Bruins if he keeps scoring the way he has everywhere he's gone. Again: the Leafs surely have the better sub-25 core, but for this season is there really a reason to expect a regression from a Bruins team with as much depth and young talent as they have?