EK392000
Registered User
- Mar 9, 2020
- 1,111
- 1,318
I'll preface this with my rationale.
This trade is contingent on the Bruins organization thinking that their window to win with Bergeron (35) and Marchand (32) is closing. They would get 2 more cracks at Lord Stanley before that window closes, but Gaudreau, as an upgrade to Debrusk, will be there to provide some needed secondary scoring. They give up some picks, but given that aforementioned window, the picks are expected to be late in the first round.
Calgary gives up the best player but gets to re-tool with Debrusk, who has shown his scoring touch but needs to find it again. The picks are meant to be flipped to address whatever needs the Flames have (offensive depth, upgrade certain positions, etc.). If the Flames are really aggressive, they could package one or both of the firsts with Monahan to get Eichel, but this is a discussion another day.
To BOS:
Johnny Gaudreau (2 years left @ 6.75 M)
To CAL:
Jake Debrusk (2 years left @ 3.675, RFA upon expiry)
2021 1st Round Pick
2022 1st Round Pick
B prospect? (Unsure as to quality of the prospect, could be convinced that a prospect is not necessary)
+Contract to make salaries work
EDIT: After some feedback, I’ll amend the offer to:
To BOS:
Gaudreau
To CAL:
Debrusk
2021 1st
Beecher
+Contract to make salaries work
OR
To BOS:
Gaudreau
2021 3rd
To CAL:
Debrusk
2021 1st
2022 1st
+Contract to make salaries work
This is just the basis of a trade. I would ask that any criticism be constructive. I don't mind it, but I would rather learn from it than just be flamed. Tell me where I went wrong. Too many picks? Quality of the prospect? Unfit trading partners?
*My valuation on Gaudreau was based a bit on his production two seasons ago and a bit on his current production. He put up 99 points in 82 GP (36 G, 63 A) two seasons ago but put up 58 points in 70 GP (18 G, 40 A) and 27 points in 40 GP (13 G, 14 A) since then.
This trade is contingent on the Bruins organization thinking that their window to win with Bergeron (35) and Marchand (32) is closing. They would get 2 more cracks at Lord Stanley before that window closes, but Gaudreau, as an upgrade to Debrusk, will be there to provide some needed secondary scoring. They give up some picks, but given that aforementioned window, the picks are expected to be late in the first round.
Calgary gives up the best player but gets to re-tool with Debrusk, who has shown his scoring touch but needs to find it again. The picks are meant to be flipped to address whatever needs the Flames have (offensive depth, upgrade certain positions, etc.). If the Flames are really aggressive, they could package one or both of the firsts with Monahan to get Eichel, but this is a discussion another day.
To BOS:
Johnny Gaudreau (2 years left @ 6.75 M)
To CAL:
Jake Debrusk (2 years left @ 3.675, RFA upon expiry)
2021 1st Round Pick
2022 1st Round Pick
B prospect? (Unsure as to quality of the prospect, could be convinced that a prospect is not necessary)
+Contract to make salaries work
EDIT: After some feedback, I’ll amend the offer to:
To BOS:
Gaudreau
To CAL:
Debrusk
2021 1st
Beecher
+Contract to make salaries work
OR
To BOS:
Gaudreau
2021 3rd
To CAL:
Debrusk
2021 1st
2022 1st
+Contract to make salaries work
This is just the basis of a trade. I would ask that any criticism be constructive. I don't mind it, but I would rather learn from it than just be flamed. Tell me where I went wrong. Too many picks? Quality of the prospect? Unfit trading partners?
*My valuation on Gaudreau was based a bit on his production two seasons ago and a bit on his current production. He put up 99 points in 82 GP (36 G, 63 A) two seasons ago but put up 58 points in 70 GP (18 G, 40 A) and 27 points in 40 GP (13 G, 14 A) since then.
Last edited: