Bolland is excellent at both ends of the ice, isn't afraid to get dirty, (i.e. finish checks, take checks and play in high traffic areas) he can be used to kill penalties and clearly has NHL "wheels". Schremp has unbelievable hands, a great shot and a great offensive mind, but never finishes checks, his defensive game is lacking and he certainly isn't going to win many foot races. Bolland can really help a team win without putting any points on the board and I wouldn't say the same for Schremp at this point. Moving to London probably wasn't the best move for Schremp, the Knights don't rely on Schremp in every situation, the way a lesser team would rely on a potential franchise player like Schremp. That being said if his offensive abilities prove to be NHL worthy, he could be a great scorer for a lot of years, I compare his offensive game to Doug Weight's. Bolland may not have Schremp's upside, but I agree with Go pierre hedin that Schremp's downside is much worse than Bolland's.
Yep he has a groin problem, but apparantly it isn't that serious. Schremp sat out 3 games this weekend to rest it but will be ready on Thursday, for a big game against Guelph.
