Value of: Bobrovsky to CGY at deadline

Discussion in 'Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk' started by Ainsy01, Nov 7, 2018.

  1. Ainsy01

    Ainsy01 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Messages:
    204
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Flames cant afford to sign him long term, but what would his value be as a rental? If Columbus is missing the playoffs and Bob is walking July 1, they realistically could ship his as a rental.

    What would it take for CGY to acquire him and take him on a run ? Goalie rentals are almost unheard of as far as I'm aware of. Has it been done? Whats the price? 2nd round pick? B prospect?
     
  2. Tysonson3

    Tysonson3 Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2017
    Messages:
    329
    Likes Received:
    183
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Ryan Miller got a 1st +. That’s a good place to start
     
  3. PanarinDangles9

    PanarinDangles9 Registered User Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2015
    Messages:
    3,215
    Likes Received:
    852
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Columbus
    1st++

    And no, we don't want Mike Smith and Jon Gillies.
     
    Viqsi likes this.
  4. Baksfamous112

    Baksfamous112 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2016
    Messages:
    2,652
    Likes Received:
    1,076
    Trophy Points:
    94
    To fit Bob into their lineup they will have to ditch a goalie, so yeah, Smith or Gillies is coming back
     
  5. typicalsavage

    typicalsavage Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2018
    Messages:
    633
    Likes Received:
    289
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Lol are you high? He's had bad start but he's still a top goalie. If all you're offerings a 2nd rounder the Blue Jackets would just keep him. Start with a 1st and Bennett/Jankowksi and go from there.
     
  6. Crede777

    Crede777 Deputized

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,782
    Likes Received:
    1,362
    Trophy Points:
    139
    They're going to have to pay extra then on top of what Bob would cost.
     
  7. blankall

    blankall Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    8,557
    Likes Received:
    465
    Trophy Points:
    124
    CBJ fans are going to be very disappointed when they see the actual return. If you expect a 1st +Bennett + extra for taking back an expiring goalie contract for a rental goalie that's just not going to happen.
     
  8. crackdown44

    crackdown44 Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2017
    Messages:
    1,191
    Likes Received:
    1,103
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Gender:
    Male
    If you are missing the playoffs then Mike Smith helps your tank. Chess not checkers
     
  9. Bought Out Browsy

    Bought Out Browsy 4.5 Mill Locker Room Leader

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    500
    Likes Received:
    150
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Calgary, Alberta
    Bob isn’t the goalie Calgary should be going after. Especially if we are giving up assets for him to walk.
     
  10. innitfam

    innitfam Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2017
    Messages:
    352
    Likes Received:
    100
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Gender:
    Male
    For a rental?

    1st + retained Mike Smith + good prospect/young roster player. The 1st and prospect/young player are for Bob's value, Smith is for cap and positional reasons (for Calgary).

    I don't see why Columbus does it though. Panarin is clearly not re-signing with CBJ, so they'll have money to sign him. Unless he agrees to reup with CBJ after he's done in Calgary.

    Columbus is also still flirting with trying to be a relevnt playoff team so trading your #1 would be... bizarre. Although, Bob hasn't exactly lit it up in the playoffs so idk, maybe its time to move on? He deserves one more shot though IMO
     
  11. Volica

    Volica Big Ttich Rittich

    Joined:
    May 15, 2012
    Messages:
    14,364
    Likes Received:
    2,872
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Starting goalies aren’t normally deadline moves.
     
  12. Viqsi

    Viqsi IA IA BLUEJACKETS FHTAGN

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Messages:
    36,886
    Likes Received:
    5,265
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Jackets 1st, Preds 2nd
    Location:
    Kölumboos
    I have no problem with getting Smith as a Bob trade throw-in / temporary cap dump given that he's also a pending UFA. If one expects that handing him to us constitutes some kind of value for us that would adjust the price downward in any way, though, then we've got a problem.

    * * *​
    What return? The plan right now is to keep him.
     
  13. CoachWithNoTeam

    CoachWithNoTeam Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Messages:
    934
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Occupation:
    Bread Winner
    Location:
    San Diego
    I believe that five or six 1sts were traded at last year’s deadline. I would think somewhere close to one of those packages. A first + B+ prospect + salary offset.
     
  14. typicalsavage

    typicalsavage Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2018
    Messages:
    633
    Likes Received:
    289
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Bobrovsky easily gets a 1st, 2nd ++. Bennett isn't that valuable. CGY would easily give up Bennett in order to get Bobrovsky.
     
    Fro likes this.
  15. blankall

    blankall Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    8,557
    Likes Received:
    465
    Trophy Points:
    124

    Right... He's already given you a trade list. Good luck with that.
     
  16. Viqsi

    Viqsi IA IA BLUEJACKETS FHTAGN

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Messages:
    36,886
    Likes Received:
    5,265
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Jackets 1st, Preds 2nd
    Location:
    Kölumboos
    1) That's a rumor from about two weeks ago, and things have improved in the interim.
    2) A trade list is not a trade request. It may arrive as part of one, but the rumor in question did not go there - it was mentioned in the context of the Jackets making the call to trade Bob, not Bob wanting to be traded from the Jackets. Indeed, every indication we have is that the current issues between player and front office is that Bob wants to stay, but feels like he's underappreciated and not getting offers worthy of his value to the team.
     
  17. Crede777

    Crede777 Deputized

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2009
    Messages:
    12,782
    Likes Received:
    1,362
    Trophy Points:
    139
    3. The Flames are almost certainly not on the list.
     
  18. Deen

    Deen Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2010
    Messages:
    6,162
    Likes Received:
    860
    Trophy Points:
    158
    Calgary can't afford to give away any more 1st round picks and that would be the starting point.
     
  19. CaptainCrunch67

    CaptainCrunch67 Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2005
    Messages:
    5,367
    Likes Received:
    427
    Trophy Points:
    124
    This, I'd pass on trading for Bob because the Flames have to keep their first round draft pick and young assets after giving them away.


     
  20. madmike77

    madmike77 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    5,683
    Likes Received:
    130
    Trophy Points:
    111
    A deadline deal wouldn’t really make sense for the Flames.

    They won’t be a playoff team at the deadline if Smith keeps playing the way he has been. They need another goalie now. And they can’t afford someone like Bobrovsky.

    I think they’re better off just going with someone like Mason. Sure he’s not at Bobrovsky’s level but he has to be better than Smith.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"