The Panther
Registered User
In short: How did Bobby Holik (with the Rangers) make $9 million/year? I've never understood this.
Devils went to the finals in 2000 and 2001 with Holik as a key player, albeit 3rd line center. Rangers at the time seemed to prioritize poaching as many players as possible from the (much more successful) Devils.
After signing with the Rangers, Holik said he was happy he didn't have to move his family, as the team's don't play that far apart.
The salary was a joke at the time. The best 3rd line center in the league... Is still a 3rd line center. Rumors were that the Devils offered him 8 million per year.... Still way too much. Holik proved in the late 90s that if you rely on him to score in the playoffs, you are probably losing early.
The NHL equivalent of "people are promoted until they reach a level where they are no longer competent at their job"
That says it all. I'd just like to add that he was big and heavy. People liked that at that time a lot more than they should have.Devils went to the finals in 2000 and 2001 with Holik as a key player, albeit 3rd line center. Rangers at the time seemed to prioritize poaching as many players as possible from the (much more successful) Devils.
After signing with the Rangers, Holik said he was happy he didn't have to move his family, as the team's don't play that far apart.
The salary was a joke at the time. The best 3rd line center in the league... Is still a 3rd line center. Rumors were that the Devils offered him 8 million per year.... Still way too much. Holik proved in the late 90s that if you rely on him to score in the playoffs, you are probably losing early.
The NHL equivalent of "people are promoted until they reach a level where they are no longer competent at their job"
I can only presume New York was continuing their long standing rivalry with Boston, and trying to top the latter's 4 year, $20 million contract with Martin freakin' LaPointe in 2001.
For the people calling him a '3rd line center', he was clearly not a 3rd line center at that point and had averaged close to 60 points/season over the previous 6 years in the middle of the Dead Puck Era. At the time, he was considered the best defensive #2 center in the NHL - that era's Ryan Kesler although a different style player.
Problem was he was already 31-32 and his play quickly saw the predictably fall-off that pretty much every player sees in his early 30s, especially a guy like Holik who was never fast to begin with.
For the people calling him a '3rd line center', he was clearly not a 3rd line center at that point and had averaged close to 60 points/season over the previous 6 years in the middle of the Dead Puck Era. At the time, he was considered the best defensive #2 center in the NHL - that era's Ryan Kesler although a different style player.
Problem was he was already 31-32 and his play quickly saw the predictably fall-off that pretty much every player sees in his early 30s, especially a guy like Holik who was never fast to begin with.
Hm, interesting. Holik actually led the Devils in scoring in both 96–97 and 97–98, and in 98–99 he was 2nd in scoring, but all those teams fell flat in the playoffs. In 99–00, voilà, Devils add Gomez, and Holik is also outscored by Arnott, and magic happens again.
Wasn't there talk of him winning the Vezina in 2001? He was being lauded a lot in those playoffs from what I remember, though it shouldn't have garnered him that kind of salary in retrospect.
Sorry, I meant Conn Smythe. I'm still stuck in the Lunqvist thread debate. I did remember correctly then about him being a candidate. Would have become the first European to win it, and a very unlikely winner indeed. My guess was one of the offensive stars like Elias or Sykora would get it.You mean the Conn Smythe? He was a candidate from the Devils, that is true. I believe Elias, Sykora, Holik, and Rafalski were the Devils' leading candidates heading into the 2001 finals
Yup. Money was no object for the Rangers, and regardless of how things turned out with their acquisitions and additions they always had the right intent in wanting to win.I was a Rangers fan back then.
The team wanted to make a big impact and signed the best center and defenceman available at that time.
I can recall thinking that the salary was ridiculous but that it didn’t really matter because it was the Rangers.
Yup. Money was no object for the Rangers, and regardless of how things turned out with their acquisitions and additions they always had the right intent in wanting to win.