TSN: Bob McKenzie article on Wade Redden (can be applied for Scott Gomez)

Discussion in 'Montreal Canadiens' started by Natey, Jan 12, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Natey

    Natey #koko

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005
    Messages:
    55,815
    Likes Received:
    1,305
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Basically, the article states that because of the new CBA 1-way contracts above $900,000 will count against the NHL salary cap, regardless if the player plays in the NHL. So even if we were to send Scott Gomez down to the AHL, his salary cap would count against the Habs cap.

    Anyway, McKenzie states that there are 3 options for Redden (which we can apply to Gomez).

    Option 1: Keep him on the NHL roster and use accordingly.
    Option 2: Put him on the AHL roster, despite having his salary count on the NHL cap.

    Now this is where it gets interesting, basically McKenzie states that with both option #1 and option #2 that the organization risks the player getting injured, in which case he WILL NOT be able to be bought out next off-season. You can't buy out an injured player. If Gomez plays in the NHL or the AHL, and ends the season on the injured list, he'll be part of the organization again next season unless traded (very unlikely).

    Which brings us to...

    Option #3: (I will use McKenzie's own words to describe);
    -> To make it not sound as harsh, they could keep him as the 23rd player and use him during practice, but keep him out of all in-game situations, and even high intensity practices.

    Thoughts? Opinions?

    SOURCE: http://www.tsn.ca/blogs/bob_mckenzie/?id=413185
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2013
  2. BLONG7

    BLONG7 Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2002
    Messages:
    23,249
    Likes Received:
    4,868
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    Nova Scotia
    Home Page:
    They may have to deal him, if they don't want him to count vs the cap...The Isles maybe?
     
  3. Captain Subban

    Captain Subban Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    10,834
    Likes Received:
    3,136
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Occupation:
    Sales
    Location:
    essex
    Option 3 is pretty much impossible. The NHLPA would have a field day.
     
  4. overlords

    overlords #DefundCBC

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    28,123
    Likes Received:
    1,479
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Location:
    The City
    So the laraque treatment, basically?
     
  5. [​IMG]

    Knowing our luck, this is a no brainer.
     
  6. Estimated_Prophet

    Estimated_Prophet Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2003
    Messages:
    5,600
    Likes Received:
    1,280
    Trophy Points:
    184
    Option 4 is to play him as little as possible on the 4th line......bet you they go with this one.

    I suppose they could stuff his jersey with bubble wrap and make him where a full shield. Throw in two heavy duty knee braces and some skate guards along with a titanium jock. Maybe he will even go to the net for once.......
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2013
  7. Natey

    Natey #koko

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005
    Messages:
    55,815
    Likes Received:
    1,305
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    I think a similar situation (I'll add it to the OP) is to carry him on the roster, but only use him in regular practice and not put him on the ice for games or high intensity practices.

    Then again, I'm not sure what the NHLPA could do so long as the player is being paid on-time. It would basically be like a paid vacation.

    Keep him and playing him is option #1. :P
     
  8. Account Terminated

    Account Terminated Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Messages:
    32,629
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Awards:
    I don't see the harm in having him stick around this season, for 48 games. His play didn't help the team win, but it didn't hurt the team in losing either. He was ineffective in both senses. He's always been a good team guy, despite what the media likes to tell us, and that comes from the mouths of his own teammates. The burial and memorial of Scott Gomez comes solely from the backwards media and impatient fans, due to his $7+ million dollar paycheque.

    You want to deal him? Fine, next year is the final year in his contract. Contact the couple of teams that are near or below the cap floor and ask for a pick in return. The new CBA also allows teams to retain some of the cap hit in a trade. Offer the team to take on Scott Gomez and 5 of the 7 million dollars on his contract, or whatever the amount is to be a better option than a buyout.

    Like I said though. His play does not help this team win, but does not push this team to lose either. For all we know, in 48 games this year he plays above and beyond expectations and has a decent season. Then, maybe teams will be more than happy to have him finish their contracts with them.
     
  9. Natey

    Natey #koko

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005
    Messages:
    55,815
    Likes Received:
    1,305
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    I don't agree with that, but too each their own. I do think that he cost the team because of his poor play. He does seem like a great team guy though (and that's why I kept wanting to give him chances) and maybe if he didn't make $7M, he'd be a better player. Less expectations, not only from fans and media, but from himself. I'm sure a guy making $7M a season and playing like he has can't be good for his confidence.

    As for the burial? I think the 11 points in 38 games last year, or 49 points in his last 118 games buries him enough. The media and fans have a right to be upset with his play, especially considering what we lost for him.

    The point of this article is saying that if he gets hurt, we're stuck with him next year regardless. I don't know if any team would be willing to pay Gomez $5M either (although I think he only makes $5M so we might be able to get a team to pay $2.5M) unless he has nearly a PPG 48-games, which isn't going to happen because I doubt he gets the linemates to produce at a clip like that.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2013
  10. I think he deserves a lot of criticism, that doesn't make us fans impatient. Where I do have a problem is how the media and fans are always making fun of him, as if his own short comings are not enough of a torture for him.
     
  11. Montreal Impact FC

    Montreal Impact FC .:| Champ's City |:.

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2012
    Messages:
    1,894
    Likes Received:
    190
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Location:
    Montreal
    It always comes back why in world we didnt dump him last year.. now we are stuck with this overpaid bum.. anyways.... unless some players overachieve BIG time. We are due to another near the bottom standings position. It really infuriates me. Its beyond me how this organisation dont understand the distraction it causes on the team.. because of gomez suckativity we end up losing kostitsyn and cammalleri... and plekanec could have asked to be traded to the way whe made him play with pathetic wingers was just that pathetic.. because we tried to resurect somehting that was dead for 2 years.
     
  12. Account Terminated

    Account Terminated Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Messages:
    32,629
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Awards:
    He does deserve a lot of criticism, mostly which comes from the amount of money he makes, but for the love of God - the hate has turned into almost meme-like territory.

    Habs have lost three straight? Gomaaaaaaaaaize.
    Habs are in dead last? Gomaaaaaaaaaaaize.
    The defense is soft? Yeah, but Gomaaaaaaaaaaize.

    For the love of God, enough. Yes, he is a burden to the team in a cap world. Yes, he doesn't help the team going forward. There are far bigger problems though in terms of why this team is a bottom-feeding team. It starts with soft defense and whether or not they're #1 will last the entire season (Markov) and having more than just one scoring line, avoiding having plugs in the top 6 and a revolving door.

    My beef is that whenever there is a problem, it's Gomez.

    All I want to see is the fans giving him a chance under Therrien's coaching. Why can't we wipe the slate clean like Bergevin and Therrien?
     
  13. Frozenice

    Frozenice the random dude

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    6,296
    Likes Received:
    94
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Even if we had to eat a third of his salary this year and next this would be my first choice and the reality is Gomez has no choice but to go along with it. I don't think sitting at home in bubble-wrap is an acceptable option for him that he would be willing to contemplate and then he's dealt with for good.

    Other players will also be on the way out, we'll have plenty of cap space.
     
  14. Estimated_Prophet

    Estimated_Prophet Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2003
    Messages:
    5,600
    Likes Received:
    1,280
    Trophy Points:
    184
    I stand corrected.
     
  15. Jigger77

    Jigger77 Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    7,802
    Likes Received:
    142
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Occupation:
    Jimmyrigger
    Location:
    Montreal
    I think he'll be a regular in the lineup. The other options aren't the Habs style.

    Then again, this is an entirely new management team.
     
  16. Blind Gardien

    Blind Gardien nexus of the crisis

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    20,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Space Goat
    Location:
    Four Winds Bar
    If the compliance buyout window is just the last two weeks in June, per the usual buyout window, then I would reluctantly bubble wrap Gomez.

    I don't like the idea of just sitting a guy out, and he's popular and *might* be able to make some sort of contribution to our team this season.

    But... weighed against the risk of having him injured when the compliance window comes... and goes... well, we just need too badly to buy his contract out this summer, I wouldn't take the chance.

    I won't blame the Habs if they stay classy though, and play him. Another but: if he plays so poorly that he is borderline or doesn't contribute at all... then you've given him his chance, been classy, and break out the bubble wrap. There is no sending him to Hamilton. It would suck beyond words if he got hurt down there and couldn't be bought out.

    Of course, maybe there is no limited window for compliance buyouts. In which case, the risk of injury is mostly mitigated, and this thread mostly goes for naught.
     
  17. Teufelsdreck

    Teufelsdreck Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Messages:
    17,668
    Likes Received:
    151
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Dress him and pray for the best. Maybe he'll have an epiphany and strive for excellence on every shift. He used to be a good player and he hasn't incurred a crippling injury.
     
  18. Agnostic

    Agnostic 11 Stanley Cups

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2007
    Messages:
    8,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    People on the internet told me that Gomez would become a trade commodity right about now... you know when all those other teams were trying to get to the cap minimum.
     
  19. habsfanatics*

    habsfanatics* Registered User

    Joined:
    May 20, 2012
    Messages:
    5,052
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I might be one of the crazy ones, but I still thnik we're with a slightly better team with gomez than without. His puck possession skill is still very good. If we're not going to replace Gomez with someone else, whcih we won't be able to this year due to lack of cap space. I prefer we play him.
     
  20. Natey

    Natey #koko

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005
    Messages:
    55,815
    Likes Received:
    1,305
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    We may be slightly better. But it would suck if he got injured in April and we had to play him next year too.
     
  21. Captain Subban

    Captain Subban Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    10,834
    Likes Received:
    3,136
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Occupation:
    Sales
    Location:
    essex
    Well sure. I think Montreal knows that as well and unless Montreal is in the playoff hunt, he isn't playing much in April. His minutes will likely be decreased and he'll be benched on the first bad game.
     
  22. Frozenice

    Frozenice the random dude

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    6,296
    Likes Received:
    94
    Trophy Points:
    71
    I was one of them. I wasn't anticipating that his skills would decline faster then his salary, that is my error.

    Bergevin says he believes in Gomez so I'll guess he'll get his time with the Habs.
     
  23. HCH

    HCH Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2003
    Messages:
    5,642
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    The Wild West
    Home Page:
    My criticism of Gomez is that he doesn't work hard. He is a floater who likes to skate in a big circle to gather momentum so he can move around flat-footed defenders before promptly losing the puck or giving it away.

    The salary is only a problem because it makes it impossible to trade him or send him to the minors. If he continues to play the way he did last year I wouldn't want him on the team at any salary.

    Fair enough but I think the Key word is give him "a" chance not multiple chances at the expense of guys who are working hard and also deserve a fair chance to showcase their skills.
     
  24. cphabs

    cphabs The 2 stooges

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2012
    Messages:
    3,708
    Likes Received:
    1,683
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Well said :handclap:
     
  25. Pi

    Pi Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2010
    Messages:
    45,523
    Likes Received:
    7,559
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    Toronto
    I think the Habs have to sit him down in the playoffs if his play in the regular season sucks (if they make it).

    Scott Gomez in a playoff intensity game...could get rocked and then the Habs can no longer buy him out.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"