Proposal: Blues-Panthers

BlueOil

"well-informed"
Apr 28, 2010
7,027
4,022
i'm not sure dunn has top pairing potential even with a good partner. top 4, sure. either way, willing to move him, but probably not for another defenseman.
 

violaswallet

Registered User
Apr 8, 2019
9,173
7,411
If we let both Dadonov and Hoffman walk, why would we trade our best goal scoring winger for a D like Dunn?
Also we don’t need Dunn if we keep Weegar.

I think that the premise was that St Louis gets a better and more expensive D to add to the top 4; they don’t seem to value Weegs as that so not worth it. Florida was assuming Dunn’s development risk
 

TheImpatientPanther

Florida Flukin Panthers > LTIR Maple Leafs
Jan 17, 2013
28,411
25,302
Ontario, Canada
You don't shelter a Top 4 defender. If they need sheltering they are a bottom-pair player.

What would you consider top 4 minutes?
The one poster I replied to made it seem like Dunn could be paired with Ekblad on the top pairing which I highly disagree with.

Also we don’t need Dunn if we keep Weegar.

I think that the premise was that St Louis gets a better and more expensive D to add to the top 4; they don’t seem to value Weegs as that so not worth it. Florida was assuming Dunn’s development risk

As long as we have Yandle, we have no use for Dunn, especially for Weegar or Tippett.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->