Enyaw
The names ... Wayne
- Jan 17, 2014
- 1,492
- 356
Anyone have a video of that Dach it?
Also, we are down to 7th worst in the league now. Need the Ducks and Sharks to get hot while we continue to suck.
I went to bed after the 1st, but I take away a few things I don't like seeing:
- Hawks lost.
- For all intents and purposes, that loss was a likely nail in the coffin
- Hawks got shut out
- Refs screwed Hawks yet again
- PK is bad now
- PP still terrible
- Strome invisible
- Kane zero goals in last 7 games.
- The scoreboard didn't fall from the rafters and crush Roussel
Has Strome ever done that ?
Has Strome ever done that ?
Hard to hate current Canucks squad, but nice that Dach wacked Rousell. 20 lbs from now, Rousell woulda stayed down.
That hit was the Hawks highlight of the night.
Like they did against Detroit in 2013. Good teams win in spite of the tedious interference of the refs. That being said, I wouldn't be against Lysiak'ing a few of the refs for failure to do their jobs correctly.I think everyone blames the refs too much. At a certain point they have to say **** the refs and win anyway.
I get what you mean, but to be fair I think Saad had the worst pass of the night...and I don't consider him a kid anymore.Way too many nerves in the kids. Screwing up every other pass, very impatient.
Safe to say this roadtrip sealed the season?
Sellers at the deadline.
Like they did against Detroit in 2013. Good teams win in spite of the tedious interference of the refs. That being said, I wouldn't be against Lysiak'ing a few of the refs for failure to do their jobs correctly.
I get what you mean, but to be fair I think Saad had the worst pass of the night...and I don't consider him a kid anymore.
And as a general comment....what the smeg was Maatta doing on the 1st goal against? He NOPE'ed out of position like Pierre McGuire was chasing him with a corndog!
49 shots, many of them with no net presence, many, many one and dones because Markstrom saw everything. 49 shots on net sounds good though.49 shots, zero goals??? Yikes. Hawks have not been getting any favors the last 4 games....
Has Strome ever done that ?
He made a huge hit a while back in one of the games where it was getting chippy. Destroyed the guy it was awesome.
Another example unfortunately that he can do it, just doesn't
I thought the same thing. A ref isn't going to change his mind if he clearly saw something live. If he didn't see interference, that's when you challenge. You don't challenge a ref that clearly saw everything and had zero hesitation waiving it off.I haven't read much of this thread (just watched the last 2 periods on PVR) but I must reiterate what I said at the time: WTF was JC thinking in challenging that goal. Not that the call on the ice was necessarily right but the ref who waved it off was in prime position and was VERY emphatic about his decision. There wasn't a chance in hell that he was going to change his mind. JC is losing me. Time to give Gallant a contract before it's too late and someone else grabs him.
I was more impressed with only 20SOG against. That's a positive you can take away.49 shots, many of them with no net presence, many, many one and dones because Markstrom saw everything. 49 shots on net sounds good though.
That hit was the Hawks highlight of the night.
I was more impressed with only 20SOG against. That's a positive you can take away.
the kid is quite ****ing huge, it’s so frustrating he usually plays like he’s smaller than DeBrincat though. He needs two speedy wings who will grind.
I thought the same thing. A ref isn't going to change his mind if he clearly saw something live. If he didn't see interference, that's when you challenge. You don't challenge a ref that clearly saw everything and had zero hesitation waiving it off.