Corby78
65 - 10 - 20
VV had a good game, way to many chances for Pitt. He kept us in it for good stretchesDeserved the win. Hopefully Samsonov plays better next game than Vanecek
VV had a good game, way to many chances for Pitt. He kept us in it for good stretchesDeserved the win. Hopefully Samsonov plays better next game than Vanecek
VV had a good game, way to many chances for Pitt. He kept us in it for good stretches
Kuzy says helloPens will always beat us in OT, we do not win against them there lol
Wilson secured us a playoff berth, thas cool
Please tell me how many of those goals were poor goaltending where Sammy saves it? The breakaway snipe to the corner? The OT tip? How about the turnover behind the net walk right in front goal?rofl.. wut?
KUZY SCREAMS HELLO!Kuzy says hello
Sammy cant even stop an unscreened slapper from the blue line.Please tell me how many of those goals were poor goaltending where Sammy saves it? The breakaway snipe to the corner? The OT tip? How about the turnover behind the net walk right in front goal?
Please tell me how many of those goals were poor goaltending where Sammy saves it? The breakaway snipe to the corner? The OT tip? How about the turnover behind the net walk right in front goal?
The second Kapanen goal was not a good look. He was off his angle on that one.Please tell me how many of those goals were poor goaltending where Sammy saves it? The breakaway snipe to the corner? The OT tip? How about the turnover behind the net walk right in front goal?
They’re both... just awful. Get ready to be bounced in the first round againThe second Kapanen goal was not a good look. He was off his angle on that one.
Jarry did outplay VV, but this was on the caps having poor puck control. You can’t let a talented scoring team that many chances. I don’t know one goal that was a “bad” goal. The snipe angel wasnt that bad, it was a great shot. For those who don’t know, the goal is bigger than the goalie.The breakaway snipe to the corner was from a terrible angle.
Jarry made many difficult saves while Vanecek only made a few.
Scoring chances and high danger changes heavily favored the Caps. The Penguins were lucky to win this one and it came down to goaltending.
He gave up 3 goals more than expected. He was terrible.VV had a good game, way to many chances for Pitt. He kept us in it for good stretches
The numbers don't agree. At 5-on-5 the Caps controlled 60.5% of the scoring chances and 68.8% of high danger scoring chances but were outscored 4-2. VV did not play well and rarely bailed them out when they needed him to. Jarry won the game for Pittsburgh or Vitek lost the game for Washington -- pick whichever one you think is more fitting.VV had a good game, way to many chances for Pitt. He kept us in it for good stretches
I defended Sammy against that accusation, and I'll defend VV with the same declaration: The players in front of him were mostly responsible for the goals tonight. VV missed several very difficult saves he never should have had to make.Sammy cant even stop an unscreened slapper from the blue line.
How about you head for an early exit with your negativity...They’re both... just awful. Get ready to be bounced in the first round again
He was also off his angle on Kapanen’s first goal. He completely flubbed it and it still looked like an easy goal because Vanecek was on one side of the net. Was also off angle on the Pens second goal. The puck never even left the ice.The second Kapanen goal was not a good look. He was off his angle on that one.
He gave up 3 goals more than expected. He was terrible.