LadyStanley
Registered User
Announced Thursday that he underwent surgery last week. 4+ month recovery expected.
Could be interesting if determined it's a hockey injury
It does bring up some interesting questions.
What happens to a player who is injured but doesn't want a surgery to enable him to return to play? Is that medical decision his right to make? It would seem like Byfuglien was waffling on this and this is why he was flirting with retirement. But if he was injured, why would he not be on LTIR?
.Could be interesting if determined it's a hockey injury
It does bring up some interesting questions.
What happens to a player who is injured but doesn't want a surgery to enable him to return to play? Is that medical decision his right to make? It would seem like Byfuglien was waffling on this and this is why he was flirting with retirement. But if he was injured, why would he not be on LTIR?
I think what may be happening here is actually the opposite situation - Buff wanted surgery because he's tired of dealing with the nagging pain, but the team doctors say he can play through it (maybe with cortisone shots) and get the surgery next summer.
So, an interesting question for the NHLPA to ponder is if it's ok to have pain relieving surgery and go on LTIR rather than play through it, even when the team doctors say that you can play for now. What's the threshold of pain have to be before you qualify for surgery yet can still earn your contract money?
I think what may be happening here is actually the opposite situation - Buff wanted surgery because he's tired of dealing with the nagging pain, but the team doctors say he can play through it (maybe with cortisone shots) and get the surgery next summer.
So, an interesting question for the NHLPA to ponder is if it's ok to have pain relieving surgery and go on LTIR rather than play through it, even when the team doctors say that you can play for now. What's the threshold of pain have to be before you qualify for surgery yet can still earn your contract money?
First off, it seems from this tweet and a different one from Hextall that it's the NHLPA that's engaging Byfugliens team, and not the other way around.
Secondly, I see no reason Byfuglien is getting compensated here. He didn't attend camp, walked away from his contractual obligations, was suspended. Decided to get surgery without consult of the team (explicitly prohibited in the CBA). What leg could he possibly stand on? If there was a differing of opinion the avenue to pursue would be to report to camp, and then file a grievance with the union when the team doctors are recommending something you disagree with.
Honestly, this situation has elements of what happened with the NY Jets of the NFL.
OG, Osemele had a shoulder injury in August, that didn't get better. He opted for surgery over a week ago, against the wishes of the Jets. They believe he could play through it, whereas Osemele got a 2nd and 3rd opinion and surgery was recommended. So, he went ahead with it without the team's approval.
As for his contract, it was became fully guaranteed the moment he made the Jets roster out of training camp. But, the Jets had fined him for missing practice, which is expected to go to a grievance due to his 2nd and 3rd medical opinions on his shoulder.
Will be interesting with Buff whether his outside medical opinions were forwarded to the Jets or not. I would expect that to be a key factor in a grievance should one be filed.
There's the pure money aspect for the Jets, but there's also the cap situation as Buff should be on LTIR which would change how the Jets can operate their roster.
From a Jets perspective consider Byfugliens contract is one of their highest it's most certainly insured. If he showed up and was put on LTIR for the season they would have all the cap space plus his contract covered. What's happened has been to the benefit of nobody it seems. It's all very odd.
Honestly, this situation has elements of what happened with the NY Jets of the NFL.
OG, Osemele had a shoulder injury in August, that didn't get better. He opted for surgery over a week ago, against the wishes of the Jets. They believe he could play through it, whereas Osemele got a 2nd and 3rd opinion and surgery was recommended. So, he went ahead with it without the team's approval.
As for his contract, it was became fully guaranteed the moment he made the Jets roster out of training camp. But, the Jets had fined him for missing practice, which is expected to go to a grievance due to his 2nd and 3rd medical opinions on his shoulder.
Will be interesting with Buff whether his outside medical opinions were forwarded to the Jets or not. I would expect that to be a key factor in a grievance should one be filed.
There's the pure money aspect for the Jets, but there's also the cap situation as Buff should be on LTIR which would change how the Jets can operate their roster.
I think what may be happening here is actually the opposite situation - Buff wanted surgery because he's tired of dealing with the nagging pain, but the team doctors say he can play through it (maybe with cortisone shots) and get the surgery next summer.
So, an interesting question for the NHLPA to ponder is if it's ok to have pain relieving surgery and go on LTIR rather than play through it, even when the team doctors say that you can play for now. What's the threshold of pain have to be before you qualify for surgery yet can still earn your contract money?
From a Jets perspective consider Byfugliens contract is one of their highest it's most certainly insured. If he showed up and was put on LTIR for the season they would have all the cap space plus his contract covered. What's happened has been to the benefit of nobody it seems. It's all very odd.
First off, it seems from this tweet and a different one from Hextall that it's the NHLPA that's engaging Byfugliens team, and not the other way around.
Secondly, I see no reason Byfuglien is getting compensated here. He didn't attend camp, walked away from his contractual obligations, was suspended. Decided to get surgery without consult of the team (explicitly prohibited in the CBA). What leg could he possibly stand on?
Well, in today's sports world, given the Trent Williams situation, who knows. On Nate Burleson's (former WR for MIN/SEA/DET for 11 seasons) last appearance on Tim and Sid, he talked about getting a complete physical from a medical group after he retired, and the doctors asked him when he broke/tore a bunch of stuff and Nate's reply was, no, I was told it wasn't that serious.He seems to have by-passed the Jets medical staff. That's more than odd.
First off, it seems from this tweet and a different one from Hextall that it's the NHLPA that's engaging Byfugliens team, and not the other way around.
Secondly, I see no reason Byfuglien is getting compensated here. He didn't attend camp, walked away from his contractual obligations, was suspended. Decided to get surgery without consult of the team (explicitly prohibited in the CBA). What leg could he possibly stand on? If there was a differing of opinion the avenue to pursue would be to report to camp, and then file a grievance with the union when the team doctors are recommending something you disagree with.
Thats basically what nathan horton did.It does bring up some interesting questions.
What happens to a player who is injured but doesn't want a surgery to enable him to return to play? Is that medical decision his right to make? It would seem like Byfuglien was waffling on this and this is why he was flirting with retirement. But if he was injured, why would he not be on LTIR?