All I want cast wise is a non-bitter jury who votes based on gameplay and not on how they feel mad being outsmarted by someone else...
I’ve been less excited that I usually am for this reason. I feel I have a good approach to analyzing the gameplay to try and figure out what’s going to happen. Which keeps me engaged and in season-long topics like ‘why won’t they try to get rid of Vanessa?’ and ‘why won’t they get rid of Paul?’ while America bangs their head against the wall. But I’m getting tired of getting to the end and seeing the wrong person win, and I didn’t even dislike some of the ones who have. The fact Bayleigh got it over on Tyler was really the kicker, I liked Kaycee but that made me want to throw my tv out the window. Sam did not belong in the house.
What I want to see from someone this year is the person who is smart enough to take what we’ve seen fault Paul and Tyler and apply that to their game.
Is someone’s strategy to win, be nice to everyone and ride coattails while winning comps in the end, or and just make it to the end and take your chances that someone’s end-strategy backfired? That is in essence what Tyler did last year, he was never truly confident that he would win, but he did want to be the best player and he did want to be liked.
What I don’t want is Team A vs. Team B and we just play teams and whoever has the most in the jury wins. However, the trend definitely seems to be that you can’t be that worried about your bases being covered because then everyone just challenges your loyalty and people don’t seem to be interested in having such depth in your game.
As always, DEATH TO SHOWMANCES!