how is this not kucherov 100%. He just had 128 pts!
Longevity, and showing up when it matters.
Bergeron is a gamer, and has a long history of being a high end player. Similar argument for Keith, though I’d say slightly less of one. I think Keith has played at a higher level, but not for quite as long.
Kucherov has played at the highest level, but the span of time is very short so far. There is also the playoff argument. Bergeron and Keith both have success in the playoffs as key players for their respective teams, and Stanley Cups to show for it. Kucherov isn’t there yet.
The argument could very quickly turn in his favor, but right now it’s short-term regular season success vs. career success(including success in the playoffs).
I can’t speak for anyone else, but it’s a no-brainer for me. The argument is between Bergeron and Keith,
at this stage.