Rumor: Benning on Markstrom: 'We want him back'

BlueOil

"well-informed"
Apr 28, 2010
7,051
4,037
i can't see markstrom getting more than 5 million a season, anything else puts him in the 10 top highest paid goalies in the league
 

Tetsuo

Boss of a Pile of Rubble
Apr 11, 2018
1,492
1,338
Michigan
i can't see markstrom getting more than 5 million a season, anything else puts him in the 10 top highest paid goalies in the league
He's also a top 10 goalie so it would be fair. Lots of the advanced stats point to Markstrom being a franchise goalie who can be a real difference maker on a team, immediately. He absolutely will be looking at a contract that is at minimum $6M per imo. If he only signs for that, the Nucks should be over the moon, unless its an 8 year deal.

That said, I think they give him an NMC for next year and a partial NTC to bring down the cost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Positive

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
15,080
9,855
From Thomas Drance and Rick Dhaliwal of the Athletic:
"Markstrom’s camp might have to be willing to bend on no-movement protection, but if you’re surrendering that chip in negotiations, you’d best be made whole in treasure and term."
Exactly, which can end up hurting Vancouver if Markstrom doesn't play well next season and Seattle choses a different option. Definitely a sticky situation.
 

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
36,004
16,400
i can't see markstrom getting more than 5 million a season, anything else puts him in the 10 top highest paid goalies in the league
I doubt that ranking figures into anything. 5 million is low. That's a standard for a 2nd line forward or Dman. An above average goalie has a bigger impact on a game than they do. I think the number starts with a 6
 

Tempo

Registered User
Jun 13, 2019
374
606
I love how Markstrom went from "He is our MVP!" to "Don't let the door hit you!" in a matter of 3 games that he wasn't even a part of. :skeptic:

Personally, I am not a fan of Markstrom, but he deserves better than that.
 

Tkachuk Norris

Registered User
Jun 22, 2012
15,658
6,766
So keep Markstrom and lose Demko in expansion. Honestly not familiar with Van’s expansion situation but that’s what it seems like.
 

Chan790

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 24, 2012
3,823
2,306
Bingy town, NY
So keep Markstrom and lose Demko in expansion. Honestly not familiar with Van’s expansion situation but that’s what it seems like.

Vancouver has protection spots to spare on defense. Two goalies, one spot. Seem well positioned at F in terms of expansion.

Maybe it's because I'm a Canes fan, but a Demko for Dman trade as a basis, with additional parts, seems like a mutual solution to problems.

We're just not a fit to help with their cap situation.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad