They are one year and 56 days apart in age. A couple weeks either way on each player’s birth and they are both in the same draft class. That’s what you keep missing. Barkov was one of the youngest players in his draft class and eichel was one of the oldest in his.
Another thing you keep missing is that Barkov has to expend energy killing penalties and playing an elite defensive game. It’s common sense that having to do that leaves him less energy on the offensive end. Barkov is asked to start shifts in the defensive zone and turn a defensive zone draw into a scoring chance in the offensive zone. Eichel isnt. These things all matter.
I want to compare the players now. You keep going back to their rookie seasons. Right now both players are pretty even when it comes to their offensive game.
Just thought I’d point out something since in your middle paragraph you eluded to barkov taking faceoffs in the defensive zone and having to work his way up the ice. You realize while Eichel may not own as many defensive zone draws or even be in his league defensively (even though he’s improved drastically in that department) one of Eichels biggest strengths is just the very same thing your saying expands energy for barkov. Eichel is the one bringing the puck from the defensive zone to the offensive zone all the time. His transition zone rush numbers were elite, he lead this category in 16-17 and that was as a 20 year old sophomore returning from a high ankle sprain. This is because of his elite skating ability. Barkov is also a great skater but after all you said “these things matter”, I’ll agree yet also point out he does that all the time.
The sabres rely on Eichel to do this so much that on powerplays they will spend fifteen seconds in the neutral zone with a drop pass, a fake and then another drop pass, and sometimes yet another, just to make sure it’s jack carrying the puck into the offensive zone. It’s an awful special teams strategy but that’s how dependant they are on him for this. Just thought since that was one of your arguments I’d point this out.
A lot of scoreboard watchers who don’t watch Eichel (not saying that’s you) seem to think he’s just this offensive player who doesent own any other responsibilities (from his past plus minus or corsi or whatever else) and it’s just not even close to true.
First poll in a while that's really let me think.
After long consideration, going Barkov. I just love his two way game and how he can play in every situation. Also has sweet hands and will be a multi time selke winner in his time.
I like posts like this and respect this opinion because you supported your answer.
For a while it seemed like Eichel was trending to be a premium goal scorer but it seems he isn't much better than Barkov in it. And Barkov owns pretty much every player without the puck and is a fantastic playmaker to boot.
This is Barkov all the way.
What do you call a 21 year old center who manages 39 assists in just 67 games last year not too mention 25 goals) on the leagues worst offense last year. We’ve seen others like Mackinnon manage just 50ish pts in awful teams (more then once) ....yet a younger Eichel managed 64 in 67 in similar pitiful circumstances. He was in on 33 percent of the teams offense and missed 20 percent of the year. Other then Eichel, the team managed just 173 goals last year. Yet he still in an injury shortened season managed to help 39 others to goals in said 67 games. That’s not a bad playmaker no? Especially with all his top transition, and offensive possession numbers he has....
Again, I don’t mind barkov but your closing argument (and I’m not trying to go court-mode here) was about playmaking ability. That’s eichels Fortay. Not goal scoring or shooting like you’ve said.
Defenisvely. Barkov is a clear notch above offensively.
How? He has never averaged more points per game better then Eichel in a season despite being older and has a better top six in his team and averages three minutes more to n ice time. Eichels got more tools and he produces consistently with less help so where is this “clear notch” barkov had offensively id love to see it....you’d think I would if it were “clear.”?
Yeah can't be that, can it?
Looking at it as objective as possible, Eichel is so much more dynamic than Barkov. Barkov's got the advantage defensively for sure, but looking at overall games, he doesn't have what Eichel has. Blows my mind how overrated Barkov is on HFBoards. These small-market darlings just cannot lose around here.
Barkov averages three minutes more too and Eichel doesent even have bad defensive numbers this year and I can refer to at least ten great not good but great defensive plays he’s made this year. Oh well.
I don’t mind people voting barkov but it’s iust the “definitely”, “clearly” (like the guy I quoted above” and the “ainec” that I find laughable....I too think that since people don’t watch Florida often, they feel guillty and obligated to stick with him. Again, I don’t mind if people vote him but at least support the he’s better offensively with facts.