cj19
Registered User
- Jul 21, 2016
- 437
- 106
At the same time, it doesn't reduce value.You realize just being a leafs player/prospect doesnt give you value
What!!! You mean Hyman wouldn't instantly slot in as BLues top line winger?This doesn't make sense for either team.
Hyman is the better player and on a solid contract for the next few years, no reason for the Leafs to move him for a maybe with middle-6 upside.
The Blues don't need a $2.25m player that would be on our fourth line, particularly when we're quite tight against the cap going forward.
Not that any of these proposals are good made by this OP but its interesting to see you as one of the first posters in every trade thread regarding a Leafs player.You realize just being a leafs player/prospect doesnt give you value
I'd be happy if Barbashev at this point got a 3rd. The main issue is what would the Blues due with Hyman? A total non-need at this point and doesn't follow the direction the Blues are heading with introducing some of their prospects this year.
Your missing my point. How do they fit him against the cap, and then who sits to make room for him?Every team needs players like Hyman, he's amongst the very best forcheckers in the league and is a top penalty-killer. What you would do with him is utilize him and be a harder team to play against.
If the Blues traded Barbashev, I’d want a futures return that didn’t add to the logjam at wing nor the salary cap liabilities.