IPS
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2017
- 15,544
- 24,698
We got a few around here who have a specialty with that, you ain't one of them don't worryI'm pretty sure I've never passed my opinion off as fact.
We got a few around here who have a specialty with that, you ain't one of them don't worryI'm pretty sure I've never passed my opinion off as fact.
I'm pretty sure I've never passed my opinion off as fact.
Got it, you were providing proof of your opinion.I'm pretty sure I've never passed my opinion off as fact.
Nobody was asking what other people's opinions were.... We were asking why that opinion exists....
Got it, you were providing proof of your opinion.
I think it's mostly you actually but I haven't the entire thread so perhaps there are others.
I think the quotes speak for themselves and don't need any further explanation but hey, that's just me. Well, me and a whole slew of other people but that's fine, we're all entitled to our opinions and it would be boring if we always agreed on everything.
LOL, yes that I'm more than happy to do.
Shanny knew.Lou had permission to speak to the Islanders ownership regarding a job.
Shanahan has no idea he was going to start recruiting Tavares to say before he even had the job title.
What Lou did was wrong.
“Larry Brooks reports that neither Islanders GM Garth Snow or LeafsPresident Brendan Shanahan were aware of the agreement for Lou Lamoriello to talk to John Tavares about his status ahead of free agency before Lamoriello officially left for the Islanders organization.
The deal between the Islanders and Maple Leafs that allowed Lou Lamoriello to talk with John Tavares even while the exec was still under contract as a senior adviser to Toronto was orchestrated by ownership, Slap Shots has learned.
It is believed that neither Islanders’ then-president and apparently still-GM Garth Snow nor the Maple Leafs’ president Brendan Shanahan was aware of the agreement. In fact, we’re further told that Snow and coach Doug Weight were kept out of the loop regarding ownership’s talks with Lamoriello while the two men were scouting at the World Championships in Denmark.”
Total snake move that didnt pan out.
I don't know why you wouldn't interpret interpretation #2 unless you already dislike Babcock.
Because I don't see a single other ****ing coach in the entire league calling out his roster make-up like that. Not a single one. It's not normal to say stuff like this.
You're probably not looking very hard, then...
If you can provide me with two quotes within the same month or even the same season by an NHL coach this year or last year which calls out his entire roster construction (not calling out single players but calling out the depth of the team or something), then I'll admit I'm wrong and eat my words.
If someone asks you to rationalize or explain your opinion, simply stating "well other people have the same opinion" isn't really an adequate or intelligent answer.
Nithannial gave a good answer.
Both those quotes are of coaches calling out the players and their commitment level, not roster construction and depth.
Both those quotes are of coaches calling out the players and their commitment level, not roster construction and depth.
Nope, you're completely wrong on this. Babcock called out the fact that the team doesn't have depth, he called out the roster construction.
Hitchcock and Gallant both called out how their team is playing "we don't want it enough, we aren't skating hard enough, etc". If Babcock had said stuff like this then I have no problem, that's just calling out players which is fine. He however went after the roster construction so he's calling out the GM.
Again like I said, find a single coach who has called out the roster construction twice within one season like Babcock just has (he also had that Muzzin acquisition quote which counts as a third one).
I think Babcock was spoiled having Lidstrom in Detroit. The Leafs defence, when healthy, is fine. Is it amazing? No, but it's not trash either. But the Leafs don't have one of the best d-men in the history of the league on their roster tilting the game significantly in their favour every time he's on the ice.
Nope, you're completely wrong on this. Babcock called out the fact that the team doesn't have depth, he called out the roster construction.
Hitchcock and Gallant both called out how their team is playing "we don't want it enough, we aren't skating hard enough, etc". If Babcock had said stuff like this then I have no problem, that's just calling out players which is fine. He however went after the roster construction so he's calling out the GM.
Again like I said, find a single coach who has called out the roster construction twice within one season like Babcock just has (he also had that Muzzin acquisition quote which counts as a third one).
or maybe you can connect the dots which would lead an open minded person to believe Mirtle wouldn't write that type of article if he knew it would piss off his good buddy Dubas and have his inside info cut off harming his career
i guess however it's much easier for some to just take a look at the sacred cow list and rag on the guy who's lower on it
and i'm wondering which one of Shanny or Dubas do you have at the top of the list ?
Babcock reportedly was pushing for the Leafs would have taken Hanifin in the 2015 draft over Marner.
Folks should let that sink in before they start to advocate allowing Babs to make GM level decisions for this roster
Babcock's not the only one who likes him.
Why Noah Hanifin's six-year contract is (probably) a bargain - TheHockeyNews
Hunter was on the Island by himself when he picked Marner. Let that sink in about Dubas as well. It cuts both ways. Hunter put his neck on the line with that Decision. People on here pass it off as a given. When that simply was not true.Babcock reportedly was pushing for the Leafs would have taken Hanifin in the 2015 draft over Marner.
Folks should let that sink in before they start to advocate allowing Babs to make GM level decisions for this roster
There's a pretty big difference between calling out your players' efforts (something the players themselves have total control over) and suggesting that the depth you have available to you isn't good enough (something the players themselves have 0 control over).This is awefully specific. Calling out your players is also questioning your roster composition. Both coaches indicated some players on the roster were a problem.
Not by himself.....I was with him on that pick.Hunter was on the Island by himself when he picked Marner. Let that sink in about Dubas as well. It cuts both ways. Hunter put his neck on the line with that Decision. People on here pass it off as a given. When that simply was not true.