Babcock III (not starting on time)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gary Nylund

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
29,894
22,150
I'm not down on the Muzzin pickup, Dubas' best move.
Not adding additional defensive depth is one of his failures.

Nah. Burning assets to add depth players who would never see the ice had multiple unforeseen injuries not happened wouldn't have been a smart move, especially when even at full health, we're underdogs to get past the 1st round anyway and HUGE underdogs to get past the 2nd round.

We should be in the mix for many years to come and we simply can't afford to spend futures every year so we have to pick our spots. We spent a good chunk of futures already to get Muzzin and we're going to need to replace guys we can't afford to keep which isn't going to be easy as it is.

Our problem is that our 80+ million worth of talent has been playing a few tens of millions below that level, not that we didn't pick up some cheap filler pieces.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ToMaLe

mclaren55

Registered User
Apr 12, 2010
614
920
Guys, don't you think some of the problem with our defence right now is its composition? We literally have 3 AHL calibre Dmen filling out our top 6. I'm not saying some of this isn't on Babcock, it is, but you can't get blood from a stone...
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACC1224

Trapper

Registered User
Nov 21, 2013
23,736
11,002
Over the course of a season, these usually get sorted out with stats like SCF%, HDCF% and personal goal differential while taking into account quality of comp and zone starts.
If I watch the game and don’t look at the numbers posted, I know Rielly needs a legit top 4 partner and Hainsey plays to much.
But...
If the game is close and I know a Mortal Kombat finish him killer move is coming, Hainsey isn’t the first name I’m associating with it.

And that sometimes is the paper problem.
Hainsey might make 3-4 great plays in OT that won’t really affect the overall underlying numbers while the other guy has a habit of twilight zone WTF play that means game over and doesn’t really affect the underlying numbers.

That’s why the game is played on the ice.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
I didn't know he had complained, thought it was you complaining about ice time distribution.
What little I saw of him speaking after the game I thought he said the team played well?

no this is about the tweet above that Babcock actually compplained that he was being forced to play his players too much because of a lack of depth, compared to nashville who was so deep they didn't ahve to.....even though, of course, nashville PLAYED THEIR TOP PLAYERS MORE THAN THE LEAFS DID.
 
  • Like
Reactions: weems and IPS

supermann_98

Registered User
May 8, 2002
9,440
7,779
Visit site
why was a LHD the target when a RHD is what this team really needed/needs???????
Probably because RHD are not as readily available.

I’d argue that Babs dropped the ball on not trading for Jensen but who knows what Detroit was asking for if there were any discussions to begin with
 

ACC1224

Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
Aug 19, 2002
73,483
38,754
Nah. Burning assets to add depth players who would never see the ice had multiple unforeseen injuries not happened wouldn't have been a smart move, especially when even at full health, we're underdogs to get past the 1st round anyway and HUGE underdogs to get past the 2nd round.

We should be in the mix for many years to come and we simply can't afford to spend futures every year so we have to pick our spots. We spent a good chunk of futures already to get Muzzin and we're going to need to replace guys we can't afford to keep which isn't going to be easy as it is.

Our problem is that our 80+ million worth of talent has been playing a few tens of millions below that level, not that we didn't pick up some cheap filler pieces.
They have more than one problem
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
Team game. Sample size. While Muz-Rie is 55%, what is the other two lines ? 47% ?

hard to tell exactly.

but here's the stats of the main pairings in those first 6gms after the trade when Muzzin-Rielly were mostly together:

Muzzin-Rielly: 75:00, 54.0cf%, 52.5scf%
Gardiner-Zaitsev: 70:15, 49.1cf%, 54.6scf%
Dermott-Hainsey: 66:40, 58.7cf%, 61.7scf%
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
@zeke - are there any stats that show how Left shot D play on the right ?
I know on average Right D make more money with worse overall stats than Left D.

I saw one study a few years ago but not enough to convince me there's anything there.
 

ShaneFalco

Registered User
Jul 15, 2012
21,414
15,770
London, On
Guys, don't you think some of the problem with our defence right now is its composition? We literally have 3 AHL calibre Dmen filling out our top 6. I'm not saying some of this isn't on Babcock, it is, but you can't get blood from a stone...

Yes it's a factor for sure right now but they were pretty crappy when everyone was healthy too. For 3 years now
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
Maybe, just maybe, professional coaches like Sutter and Babcock understand something that CantLoseWithMatthews (of hfboards fame) doesn't and that handedness matters as a defenceman?

ron hainsey shoots left.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
Probably because RHD are not as readily available.

I’d argue that Babs dropped the ball on not trading for Jensen but who knows what Detroit was asking for if there were any discussions to begin with

Jensen is playing a strict bottom pair role with Washington, as he should.
 

BertCorbeau

F*ck cancer - RIP Fugu and Buffaloed
Jan 6, 2012
55,132
35,630
Simcoe County
But seriously even asides from that, a team with Matthews-JT-Kadri down the middle with Nylander-Marner on the wings, and Rielly-Muzzin in the blue line should be able to compensate for that lost depth

And that’s not even mentioning some other solid names.

Babcock should be really publically holding himself accountable. If he’s unwilling to do that even privately, he needs to go
 

rumman

Registered User
Sep 10, 2008
13,392
9,504
I'm not down on the Muzzin pickup, Dubas' best move.
Not adding additional defensive depth is one of his failures.
it would have been two thumbs up for me if his contract had term, time will tell if this was a good move or another expensive rental.
 

ACC1224

Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
Aug 19, 2002
73,483
38,754
it would have been two thumbs up for me if his contract had term, time will tell if this was a good move or another expensive rental.
I thought he was signed for next year as well?
 

rumman

Registered User
Sep 10, 2008
13,392
9,504
Probably because RHD are not as readily available.

I’d argue that Babs dropped the ball on not trading for Jensen but who knows what Detroit was asking for if there were any discussions to begin with
wasn't aware Bab's was making trades? :sarcasm:
 

IPS

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
15,487
24,580
Guys, don't you think some of the problem with our defence right now is its composition? We literally have 3 AHL calibre Dmen filling out our top 6. I'm not saying some of this isn't on Babcock, it is, but you can't get blood from a stone...
You'd swear were the only team who's ever dealt with injuries in the history of the NHL with some of the posts you read around here.

The problems we're seeing were apparent long before Dermott/Gards got injured.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ToMaLe and SAMCRO44

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
But seriously even asides from that, a team with Matthews-JT-Kadri down the middle with Nylander-Marner on the wings, and Rielly-Muzzin in the blue line should be able to compensate for that lost depth

but this is why Babcock's complaints are so hilarious - he complains that he has to play his best players too much now because he doesn't have depth, BUT HE"S NOT EVEN PLAYING THEM AS MUCH AS EVERY OTHER TEAM PLAYS THEIR BEST PLAYERS, even now, when he needs to compensate for injuries.

it's insanity.

he doesn't even seem to realize what his own coaching decisons are.
 

A1LeafNation

Obsession beats talent everytime!!
Oct 17, 2010
27,325
17,253
The depth concerns might not be depth concerns at all if the called up Sandin/Liljegren

;)

What depth concerns. It's all in Babcock's head. We are deep on forward and in goal with NHL experience. We literally have 9 guys with 50+ games experience.

Rielly Hainsey
Gardiner Zaitsev
Muzzin Ozhiganov
Dermott Marincin
Borgman

We also have 4 more guys who are NHL ready in a pinch. Holl Liljegren Sandin Rosen.

This coach is full of shit. What other coaches go on about depth when injuries hit...Cassidy? Gallant? No they f***ing coach.

Undermining the GM. f*** off.
 

rumman

Registered User
Sep 10, 2008
13,392
9,504
I thought he was signed for next year as well?
he is, so will they be able to afford him? Use him as "own rental?" He'll be another quality player they won't be able to resign due to cap issues, just like Gard's this year. Lots of talent walking out of Toronto for nothing these last few years, our system must be incredibly deep? :sarcasm:
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
Babcock complained about having to play his best players too much in a game he did this:

Rielly 24:37
Muzzin 22:00

Tavares 19:28
Marner 19:13
Matthews 18:19


seriously.

in a league where other teams are playing forwards 25+ mpg and dmen 30+ mpg when they need to, Babcock is actually complaining that he's being forced to play dmen not even 25mpg and forwards not even 20mpg.

it doesn't even make sense.

the man has lost it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->