I like their potential defensive prospects (Fleury and/or Bean) as well as some of their forward prospects (Roy and/or Gauthier). I think they have every bit as much in terms of the Islanders (I would argue more) and I think they blow Nashville out of the water. I don't think Nashville's pool is great now that many have graduated. I like Fabbro and Kamenev, but I have questions after that. I also have real questions about Fiala and his injury, although he reportedly has already begun light skating.
We know how unreliable rumors are, but it sounds like the best, or possibly only, deal Sakic had on the table was Travis Hamonic and a 1st round pick for Matt Duchene.
It's easy to see why that deal is not very appetizing, but a lot of fans still want to nail Sakic to the damn cross.
Just a question - is there really *that* much difference between Hamonic and a guy like Karl Alzner?
Yes, I realize Alzner is older and will command more in free agency. But the point is that if Colorado is looking for a run-of-the-mill top 4 defenseman, they have amongst the most cap space in the NHL to go get one.
Then, they could still move Duchene for futures and the overall net gain would be more.
Not saying that situation will come about, just trying to highlight the only deal Sakic probably had was mediocre.
We know how unreliable rumors are, but it sounds like the best, or possibly only, deal Sakic had on the table was Travis Hamonic and a 1st round pick for Matt Duchene.
It's easy to see why that deal is not very appetizing, but a lot of fans still want to nail Sakic to the damn cross.
Just a question - is there really *that* much difference between Hamonic and a guy like Karl Alzner?
Yes, I realize Alzner is older and will command more in free agency. But the point is that if Colorado is looking for a run-of-the-mill top 4 defenseman, they have among the most cap space in the NHL to go get one.
Then, they could still move Duchene for futures and the overall net gain would be more.
Not saying that situation will come about, just trying to highlight the only deal Sakic probably had was mediocre.
Hamonic + 1st + prospect
Snow was also complaining about Sakic wanting both Barzal and Pulock, so that tells me one of them was an option.
This isn't the first deal Sakic has turned down for Duchene either.
Plus, it's multiple teams complaining about what he wants since the deadline.
Seems pretty obvious that Sakic is just being a stubborn jackass.
It might not have been the same.
I'm not assuming there is gamesmanship. I'm assuming Sakic is too nutless to make a trade for anything that's not an obvious overpay, and everyone is getting fed up with it.
The other GMs have been operating under the assumption than Sakic is less stubborn than he really is. Now that they are learning the truth they will either up their offer to get a player they feel they need or they will look elsewhere.
If they think RNH or JvR are difference makers, I'd disagree. I'm not even sure Duchene is but I'd take him over the likes of those two any day. Supply of good forwards is somewhat limited.
I'm probably crazy in this but part of me is glad Sakic isn't coming down from his asking price. I mean, I know this situation is going from bad to worse and Duchene needs to be traded and soon. But seriously **** these teams who think we're going to give him away for whatever package happens to fit for them. **** right off with your Hamonic packages.
I don't totally disagree as a whole, but in this particular situation with what I do have. I'm on Sakic's side. We have not seen a single offer leaked that we all think is fair. The only one most people think he should have taken came from Hench's comments about Ottawa from last year. So like I said I agree as a whole, but right now with what has been leaked I don't think Sakic should cave to Duchene, his agent, or any other GM.