Honestly, the Kerfoot-Duchene-Yakupov line was a real success chemistry wise, at least for a little bit. Yak never played the same after Duchene left.
The Avs' penalty problems are due more to Bednar and his system.
Kassian is not somebody I'd want. But Paquette isn't going to make it worse here. Either way, they are not the penalty problem and wouldn't be long-term. Bednar's system is the real problem there.
I was curious at how many minor penalties we have been taking under Bednar so I looked:I bring this up all the time now, but Bednar's teams have almost always been middle of the pack in PIMs, except for one AHL year, and this season.
I'm not a big Bednar fan, but the penalty problems are specific to this team, not Bednar. Even more so than the slower team Bednar had play the same system in 2016-17.
2007-08 Stingrays - 21st in PIMS
2008-09 Stingrays - 15th in PIMS
2010-11 Rivermen - 3rd in PIMS
2011-12 Rivermen - 21st in PIMS
2014-15 Falcons - 12th in PIMS
2015-16 Monsters - 10th in PIMS
2016-17 Avalanche - 14th in PIMS
2017-18 Avalanche - 12th in PIMS
2018-19 Avalanche - 2nd in PIMS
Much of the change can be attributed to the addition of Cole. He's already got 113 PIMs with 7 major penalties. Mikko also has 20 more PIMs as well. Outside of that, there's small difference plus and minus.
In fact EJ has almost cut his PIMS/gm in half. MacKinnon has almost cut his in half as well. Zadorov has cut down his PIMS a fair bit also.
The difference is mostly the addition of Cole.
I was curious at how many minor penalties we have been taking under Bednar so I looked:
2016-17: 11th
2017-18: 8th
2018-19: 4th
Johnson:
14-15: 9 in 47 GP (0.19)
15-16: 15 in 73 GP (0.20)
16-17: 2 in 46GP (0.04)
17-18: 19 in 62 GP (0.31)
18-19: 9 in 71 GP (0.13)
MacKinnon:
14-15: 12 in 54 GP (0.22)
15-16: 9 in 72 GP (0.12)
16-17: 8 in 82 GP (0.10)
17-18: 15 in 74 GP (0.20)
18-19: 15 in 73 GP (0.20)
Zadorov:
15-16: 6 in 22 GP (0.27)
16-17: 28 in 56 GP (0.50)
17-18: 39 in 77 GP (0.51)
18-19: 28 in 61 GP (0.46)
I wish people would be a little more patient with Jost.If Joe can pull off a Zucker for Jost trade that would be huge.
Zucker is a level of player we wish Jost could become.I wish people would be a little more patient with Jost.
I wish people would be a little more patient with Jost.
He had one season over 50 points. He's a good player but I'm higher on Jost than most. I think alot of people just have written him off too soon.is a level of player we wish Jost could become.
At the moment yes. But I think we could get him for a much better deal. And if we can't I'd strongly prefer keeping Jost.Me too. I believe Jost will become a solid NHL player. Perhaps not worthy of a #10 overall pick, but a good NHLer nonetheless.
That said, Zucker is far superior.
I wish people would be a little more patient with Jost.
I was curious at how many minor penalties we have been taking under Bednar so I looked:
2016-17: 11th
2017-18: 8th
2018-19: 4th
Johnson:
14-15: 9 in 47 GP (0.19)
15-16: 15 in 73 GP (0.20)
16-17: 2 in 46GP (0.04)
17-18: 19 in 62 GP (0.31)
18-19: 9 in 71 GP (0.13)
MacKinnon:
14-15: 12 in 54 GP (0.22)
15-16: 9 in 72 GP (0.12)
16-17: 8 in 82 GP (0.10)
17-18: 15 in 74 GP (0.20)
18-19: 15 in 73 GP (0.20)
Zadorov:
15-16: 6 in 22 GP (0.27)
16-17: 28 in 56 GP (0.50)
17-18: 39 in 77 GP (0.51)
18-19: 28 in 61 GP (0.46)
Avs got a goon on their handsRantanen is really falling in line with the team trend ... 22, 34, 54 PIMs in 2016-17, 17-18, and this season respectively.
I was curious at how many minor penalties we have been taking under Bednar so I looked:
Me too. I believe Jost will become a solid NHL player. Perhaps not worthy of a #10 overall pick, but a good NHLer nonetheless.
That said, Zucker is far superior.
If Ferland is a mini Landeskog why would we even want him? I've been told Landeskog is a terrible captain.
If Joe can pull off a Zucker for Jost trade that would be huge.
Zucker is 6 years older, Jost just turned 21. When Zucker was 20, turning 21 during the season he had 4 goals, 5 pts. in 20 games in the NHL, and 50 pts. in 55 games in the AHL. Followed that up with 4g, 1a in 21 gp in the NHL and 13 pts in 22gp in the AHL. He hit 20 goals in his 2014-15 season which he started at 22.75 yrs old. If you are looking at a similar path for Jost that would technically give him until the 2020-21 season to hit the same mark. The biggest **** up with Jost is that he should have spent all of last year down in the A just like Rantanen did his first season.... 1 yr of college hockey at 18 years old does not equal 1 year of pro hockey at the AHL level.
Have the Avs hindered his development? Avsolutely, but is he a lost cause??? I don't think so.. he's shown some glimpses... it's like playing Cranium and if you get the first question right you get to go on the fast track as opposed to getting it wrong and having to take the slow track. Avs and Jost got it wrong so he's on the slow track but hopefully he still develops into a useful top 6 forward in the NHL.
The only real knock I see is his acceleration. Him not having skills conducive to being a good NHL player is just flat out wrong IMO. I guess we'll see but I think it comes from too high of expectations being put on him.I think the issue everyone has is that Jost doesn’t have many skills conducive to being very effective NHL player. Or the skills he does have are therefore effected by his lack of skating ability and size.
The only real knock I see is his acceleration. Him not having skills conducive to being a good NHL player is just flat out wrong IMO. I guess we'll see but I think it comes from too high of expectations being put on him.