Well I certainly don't equate it with "not guilty".
Keep sticking up for the abuser, though! Thumbs up.
Nolo contendre as a practical matter means that the accused will not admit guilt but is willing to accept a negotiated punishment.
It usually is a sign of the prosecution knowing that their case is good but not iron clad and the defendant knowing they could incur a lot of expense and a more severe punishment if they chose to contest the charge.
Given the very minimal punishment offered to Waston by the prosecution and accepted by the court, it's absolutely silly to try to use the argument "well if he really was innocent he would have fought the charges and since he didnt he's guilty as hell."
The XM guys at noon were griping about why an arbiter was allowed to overrule the NHL. (But it was Boomer and he made the same argument about the Supreme Court so that gives you a hint about the depth of his intellect). But the fact is the NHLPA will never give up the right to independent arbitration in these cases. It's the price of doing business.