I like how he made the article free to read.
Yeah, I really respect him for trying to tell both sides of the story and for giving the kid a chance to speak. But he is getting railed pretty hard at the moment...
I like how he made the article free to read.
Yeah, I really respect him for trying to tell both sides of the story and for giving the kid a chance to speak. But he is getting railed pretty hard at the moment...
It's a puff piece. The intro leads you to believe questions of consequence would be asked. None of that happens. Even the parents get a redemption arc.
Wouldn’t surprise me, the “women of sports” have banded together which is fine, but don’t go posting glam shots of yourself and expect to be taken as seriously, IMO anyway.
Just wanted to put that out there.... i guess.
Yeah, I really respect him for trying to tell both sides of the story and for giving the kid a chance to speak. But he is getting railed pretty hard at the moment...
Supposedly this was the biggest hockey news story of the week and it doesn’t get mentioned at all on HNIC Headlines. I think this is in the rear view mirror now.
The same Folks that will follow this kid for Life will line up to demand a drug addict or psycho murderer get a 2nd chance. They are the perpetually offended. The Progressive SJW who is as far from progressive as one can get.It sounds like he's done everything he can to redeem himself. I mean, what more is there a teenager can do to make up for that? It certainly shouldn't carry a life sentence keeping him from pursuing college and a professional sports career. He's going to face hate groups the rest of his life if he stays in the public eye in any way. Isn't that enough? It seems to me people that don't want him to play hockey again won't be satisfied until they see him suffer. Pretty sad. I hope he lives a squeaky-clean life, becomes an anti-bullying spokesperson and turns into an all-star just to kill the cancel culture crew with kindness.
I guess it's foolish for me to ask this question prior to reading the article but what was Craig trying to accomplish by writing this?
Editor’s note: When representatives for Mitchell Miller reached out to see if I was interested in interviewing Miller, I made it clear that there would be conditions attached to that interview, and only after that interview would I decide whether it warranted a story.
ClicksI guess it's foolish for me to ask this question prior to reading the article but what was Craig trying to accomplish by writing this?
I guess it's foolish for me to ask this question prior to reading the article but what was Craig trying to accomplish by writing this?
JinxClicks.
Miller's reps reached out to Craig to use him for an 'interview' even though the article itself is just an uncritical regurgitation of rehearsed lines from Miller and co.
I can’t disagree more with the cynical opinions expressed on this in the last few replies.
Thats why i suggested back then that we could get him and demand him to work with disabled kids/adults.Anyone who’s against a teenager working to redeem himself for mistakes he’s made in the past, needs to do some MAJOR soul-searching.