"Play the kids...until they become too expensive!"
I've learned to usually ignore your particular brand of "discussion", but I'm feeling spicy today, so I'll bite.
I was fully on board with AA getting more than what he received last year (albeit still on a short term deal), because I was highly encouraged by his potential, and thought he could improve on his shortcomings.
Then, he played hardball, and ended up getting the one year deal, which WAS his audition. If he came up aces, you shell out the bigger bucks to lock him up long term. If he just did ok, then you string him along with another cheap deal, while at least considering possible trade options.
He took that audition...and wet the bed, doing absolutely nothing to indicate that he will "figure it out" while in Detroit. He's still a coach's nightmare, a bad example to his teammates, and he's not shown growth in his production.
That's not a guy you give a 116% raise to. Not right after an entire regular season of using him as the poster child of, "when you don't buy in to the Red Wings way, you get benched". That just undermines the coach's message.
AA can be the fastest player in the world, but if he's skating in the wrong direction, then you don't financially encourage the behavior. People have already posted comparables in this very thread, and he's getting overpaid. And while one guy making $500K too much is no biggie, continuing the trend of 10-12 guys that way will keep this team wasting $5-6M every year, which IS a significant amount.
So no, it's not as simple as, "Play the kids... Until they're overpaid." It's more like, "Play the kids... Until they show they don't belong here." And had AA shown SOME sort of improvement, I'd want to still be patient. But he used his second chance as toilet paper, so why give him a cushy deal like that?