BraveCanadian
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2010
- 14,691
- 3,559
Uh, what? We're comparing the 70s to the 40s here, bro! The only decade worse than the 70s was the 40s.
Yeah, except for goalies, bro!
And don't pretend you don't agree.
Uh, what? We're comparing the 70s to the 40s here, bro! The only decade worse than the 70s was the 40s.
One thing I dont like you saying BC is that Robert was "on pace" for more. Otherwise I can say: Oh, Henrik Sedin has a good resume already, plus he's on pace for a couple more top 5 assists seasons.
And how does Parent's retro sv% compare to Broda that made this revelation possible?
Yeah, except for goalies, bro!
And don't pretend you don't agree.
Does it not make sense that if a criterion that I value becamse available and it favoured Parent, that I would raise my opinion of Parent slightly? There was not some "Broda Ceiling" that I wasn't allowed to raise him past because Broda didn't have sv% stats.
I don't agree. Dryden/Parent/Esposito/Vachon/Cheevers and the starts and ends of a few other good careers is not less impressive an era than Broda/Durnan/Brimsek/Rayner and some WW2 scrubs.
In addition, regardless of what we think of the goalies, the competition they played against is important. The league was never weaker than it was in the 1940s. We talk about wanting to know what players did "at the top level". The 1940s are less of a "top level" than the 1970s and yes, what they did in that era means a little less than what others did in the 1970s. We know this about all other players - goalies are not immune just because three of them dominated the all-star spots.
You really are simple arent you. In the last series LF was not matching his first line against mine.
Rick Middleton much? 50 goal scoring Trottier? 6 time 30 goal scorer Gillies? Lapointe?
AGAIN. MacLeish can create and finish his own plays. Robert has 4 top 20s in assists and was on pace for more.
He has almost as many playoff goals playing primarily for the Dead Wings than your whole second line. You do the math.
Again, that is fine since they will be shutting down your third line which features a couple of offensive players and leaves my second line to run rampant over yours.
Again, to wear you down and tear you down.
Again, he complements his partner well and is being underrated.
TDMM, don't we think the relative talent weakness in the 40s could have contributed to making the goalies looks better than they were? That's total speculation on my part, but I would think it's at least a somewhat sensible guess.
From a pure goal scoring basis im confident Danny Grant has more value then Clark Gillies.
How can it favour Parent when you have nothing to compare it to regarding Broda? Wow.
I don't even know what to say. If for no other reason than the availability of voting records like TDMM pointed out.
That is not true. The league in the 40s was the top level by default.
The league in the 70s was not, because there were Euros who could have played in it, and a competing league in addition.
TheDevilMadeMe said:When searching for info on Charlie Gardiner, I found that it appears the hockey establishment felt very favorably towards the 40s goalies. Basically, Gardiner was widely considered the best goalie ever (yes even better than Benedict, but that is probably unfair as the hockey establishment hated Benedict's style and his drinking problem). But then the 40s came along, and suddenly, you have guys who were "as good as Gardiner" or "may have been even better.". For whatever reason, the 40s appear to be a good decade for goaltending at the top, despite being a poor decade in overall talent.
Definitely possible (and hey, as the owner of Charlie Gardiner who played in the strong early 30s, I like where this is going... Heh).
Seriously though, the real question becomes how much do we discount them? I don't think anyone ranks a pre-1950 goalie in their top 7 or 8 goalies of all time.
So Trottier will be passing himself the puck?
Macleish is not going to be skating around my players like pylons im not sure why you think he capable of this? He is not Mario Lemieux.....on pace?? who cares what he was on pace for its what happened and maybe 4 top 20's in assists is very weak.
So Scott Gomez who has more career goals then the entire forward core of the Columbus blue Jackets would skate circles around them? For whatever reason your pretending like the regular seasons stats just didnt happen.
Lebedev is not that menacing whatsoever. Everytime our 3rd line sees the ice it will consist of scoring chances for my line because your line will produce nothing.
And Phil Housley compliments Larry Robinson well, it doesnt mean he deserves to be on a top pairing.
If you want to bring up "Complimenting his partner" Davydov-Kuzkin who were a mainstay together for the USSR must get massive bonus points
Do you have stats to back that up?
Really?
Not going to repeat myself about this any longer, you can go ahead and keep trying. MacLeish led two cup winners in scoring.. what did your second line do in the playoffs?? Lets have an answer.
The difference is that for some players regular season stats don't translate into post season stats. My players have post season production and/or outstanding post seasons. A proven track record.
Yours do not. And that means I have proven capability on my second line and you don't.
That is your opinion. My opinion is that my Selke winning center is going to shut down the playmaking on your line, my grinding wingers are going to beat on you and wear you down, you'll spend a lot of time going back into your zone to retrieve the puck from the boards with your tiny defensemen against Mike McPhee, and you are generally not going to like playing against them
Nice exaggeration.
They definitely have built in chemistry but what did they do against pros?
Desjardins is the best player on either 2nd pairing.
Yes really, who will capitalize on Trottiers Goal scoring. Geoffrion is by far the best goal scorer in this series playoffs/regular season/pre season it doesnt matter how you slice it. Your top unit goal scoring is weak
How can you not understand the principle that two of them played on bad teams and did not have an opportunity to produce during there primes in the playoffs? So what we completely ignore Ronty and Litz prime seasons? Is that where you are going with this?
Exactly and unfortunatly for you Ronty and Litzenberger did not play in the playoffs during their primes so you cant make that claim. Again what do we do completely ignore their prime seasons in the regular season against the exact same players they would have faced in the playoffs
I have a selke winner on my 4th line big deal. Haha so your offense consists of me "gspending a lot of time going back into my zone to retrieve the puck" WOW
Paul Shmyr was 4th all-time in the WHA in Penalty Minutes...I dont think he will be intimidated by Mike Mcphee..
Do you have any valid arguement to prove Ramsey belongs on a top pairing?
For starters Kuzkin captained team Russia in the 72 summit Series against one of the best Canada teams of all time.
Davydov is miles ahead of Desjardins. You cant penalize Davydov because of Era and Where he played. Again he was ranked as the 3rd best Russian of all-time during the Olympics and has one several first team all-star selections in the Russian league.
I feel pretty comfortable with it actually, considering their defensive and physical game that gets added to the mix.
How can you not understand that coulda shoulda woulda isn't as good as been there done that?
For all we know you have a line of Marleaus here.
Do you not understand what a checking line actually does in hockey?
Your bottom four are all very small. He may not be intimidated but he isn't going to push a guy like McPhee off the puck. And if he takes penalties trying to contain my checking lines cycle, then great for us.
Sure, have a look: Mike Ramsey
So they beat up on amateurs, lost to an out of shape Canadian team (admittedly they were much better than anyone expected), and now he is miles ahead of a two time post season allstar. I mean I like Kuzkin's leadership reputation and all but..
I'm pretty confident I'm happy with Smith and Desjardins on my second pairing over your little guys.
So you have already admitted your first line is weak offensively and your 3rd line is non-existant offensively....
Also what is Ramseys Norris Record....
I honestly feel like this team is way weaker then LF's team. There are just too many question marks and they are way too dependent on the 2nd line to score goals.