Hawkey Town 18
Registered User
Why would that matter? Of course the average size would change over a player's career... by fractions of an inch. Considering this important would be the pinnacle of micromanagement.
Not if the size of the average top level hockey player has gone up considerably faster than the size of the average full-grown male.
In today's hockey world, the biggest and bulkiest are going to rise to the top. It doesn't appear that was the way it was back then. It's important to judge all aspects of a player in relation to their peers, including their size. The player's non-hockey playing brother and next door neighbour is NOT their peer. Other hockey players are.
Does anyone know if average size has gone down after the lockout? I would think with the rule changes there would be more smaller faster guys and less big pylons.