What are courtnall's scoring finishes again?
Wendel Clark was never a top 30 scorer.
Reen, I really don't think you can win with three pure scoring lines. I have three scoring lines myself, but that's a luxury having an elite two way center affords me. I also have a defensive left winger on every line.
You seem to be building 3 lines that aren't going to be able to handle things in their own zone, and I don't think that's a recipe for success.
If you rely on the kasper line for every defensive zone draw, you are going to give them more ice time than gretzky. I'm also not a fan of having a flaky offense-only player like kovalev on a 4th line - I think there is zero chance of him playing hard with fourth line ice time.
Believe me, it's better you hear this now than when younger done drafting.
Basically, you should spend your next few picks looking for two way forwards in my opinion. Courtnall might be that guy- I always get him confused with another guy
what does flaky means , 3rd time I heard the word dont know what it means
If you have Gretzky on his line, sure. Otherwise, leave him at his natural position of center.Would I be notably penalized for using Nicholls as a RW, where he played during his best 1.5 seasons with Gretzky and showed he could really excel, vs a C, where he spent most of his career?
If you have Gretzky on his line, sure. Otherwise, leave him at his natural position of center.
Gretz makes anybody better so citing a season and a half of boosted stats on Wayne's line means nothing about Bernie's ability at right wing.
LF, for me it depends in the purpose of the line. If it's a standard 4th line, I think he can hit guys and chip in points fine from the wing
If you rely on the kasper line for every defensive zone draw, you are going to give them more ice time than gretzky. I'm also not a fan of having a flaky offense-only player like kovalev on a 4th line - I think there is zero chance of him playing hard with fourth line ice time.
Believe me, it's better you hear this now than when younger done drafting.
Reen could look to last year's Chicago Blackhawks for a team that went with three "offensive" lines and a defensive fourth line. All top 3 lines had at least a 1.5 ratio of offensive zone faceoffs to defensive zone faceoffs. And the fourth line with John Madden took almost twice as many d-zone draws as o-zone draws. It helped that the Hawks were a great puck possession team.
I think you need at least one strong two-way line in your top 3 lines that can go against the other team's best, though. Chicago had that.
OPTION A:
Richards - Sakic - Cook
Demitra - Johansson - Finnigan
OPTION B:
Demitra - Sakic - Cook
Richards - Johansson - Finnigan
OPTION C:
Demitra - Sakic - Cook
Marleau - Richards - Finnigan
Advice?