Kane got to play ridiculously well in the last 2 to win. Been OK, but nothing close to deserving this award (he might of course end up top scorer).
For Modric to lose now in my opinion. Realistically only see Hazard taking it from him. Kante has been great, but those kind of players rarely win these kind of awards (or never).
As he should mind you I don't think he's head and shoulders above everyone but he's the biggest reason why his team is in the final. That and subasic pk heroics. It has to go to someone playing in the final and France do not have a standout save for maybe Kante but they have been a strong unit.Modric will win this.
He should and he will.If France wins, Modric won't win and IMO shouldn't.
Who do you have if France wins?If France wins, Modric won't win and IMO shouldn't.
100% Ngolo Kante if France wins.Who do you have if France wins?
Kante is definetly the most deserving one of the French players, but sadly for him he doesn't have the narrative behind him.As he should mind you I don't think he's head and shoulders above everyone but he's the biggest reason why his team is in the final. That and subasic pk heroics. It has to go to someone playing in the final and France do not have a standout save for maybe Kante but they have been a strong unit.
Disagree.He should and he will.
Well I beleive the GB should be given to the best player in the WC, not the best player on the winning team.Disagree.
Modric wasn't better than Kante or Varane in this WC and if he loses, there's absolutely no argument for him winning it, besides being the bigger name.
His team didn't exactly dominate the competition either (3 straight ET) with Modric delivering goal or assist left and right. His team is in the final because of team play, not him playing super-hero.
He's no more deserving than many french players, and he's in fact not more deserving than some of his teammates (Subasic comes to mind).
Of course, if he wins the final, then him or Subasic, or someone dominating the final. No argument there.
If he loses? There's no way he SHOULD win it.
It's your prerogative to think that, just as it mine to disagree with it. Luka has dominated the midfield in all but one game where Denmark basically neutralized the midfield by punting the ball to Poulsen at all times.Well, what made Modric any better than Kante or Varane or Lloris?
Nothing.
In fact, I think Subasic has had a better WC than Modric.
And Kante dominated the midfield in every game of this tournament.It's your prerogative to think that, just as it mine to disagree with it. Luka has dominated the midfield in all but one game where Denmark basically neutralized the midfield by punting the ball to Poulsen at all times.
I'm arguing that Modric doesn't deserve anymore than the guys I listed and thus the final should decide who gets it.Come on Evilo. Modric has been the boss of an overachieving team and been clearly the MVP of the tournament. Can't believe you are arguing that Lloris should get it over him.
If Kante wins it that would at least be somewhat OK, but aside from him...