Micklebot
Moderator
- Apr 27, 2010
- 53,645
- 30,814
Looking at Tampa, next season I dont know how they are going to make things work.
Right now they have $11M to sign Point and Erne. Might be tight, but it can be done.
Next year they will have $13M (minus whatever Point and Erne sign for) to re-sign Cirelli, Joseph, Martel, Cernak and Sergachev.
Stamkos, Palat, Gourde, Johnson, Killorn, Hedman, McDonagh all have NTC or NMC
Anyone have the Coles notes on the Fenton article? If not for our owner, I think Minnesota would be in a worse situation than us. Long term anyway. But they have an owner with the means and desire to turn it around. We don't.
Wow! Wish the Sens had that problem!
Jonathan Dahlen, Sens 2nd rounder and key component of the ill-fated Alex Burrows trade (and later traded to San Jose this past season), has returned to play in the Swedish league with Timra for the 2019-20 season.
Lots of chitter-chatter from his time in Vancouver about his attitude, and some scouting reports hinting that his skating hasn't improved much since his draft year. Wonder if he'll find his way to the NHL eventually and this is just a speed bump, or if he's back to Europe for good.
Jonathan Dahlen, Sens 2nd rounder and key component of the ill-fated Alex Burrows trade (and later traded to San Jose this past season), has returned to play in the Swedish league with Timra for the 2019-20 season.
Lots of chitter-chatter from his time in Vancouver about his attitude, and some scouting reports hinting that his skating hasn't improved much since his draft year. Wonder if he'll find his way to the NHL eventually and this is just a speed bump, or if he's back to Europe for good.
Not sure if it's good assessment or just luck that both Dahlin and Rundblad, the next coming of Karlsson both didn't pan out. Not that Burrows was a steal in the deal like Turris was though.
Not a coincidence, sometimes you have to hand it to the scouting staff. Despite all the flare, they obviously see some red flags or issues that wouldn’t allow both rundblad and dahlen to achieve their potential. Only problem was, trading rundblad was a home run and trading dahlen was a dud with Alex burrows (and an extra 2 year contract). Most fans should just be upset that they didn’t sell high, it then again maybe the word was out on him
Not a coincidence, sometimes you have to hand it to the scouting staff. Despite all the flare, they obviously see some red flags or issues that wouldn’t allow both rundblad and dahlen to achieve their potential. Only problem was, trading rundblad was a home run and trading dahlen was a dud with Alex burrows (and an extra 2 year contract). Most fans should just be upset that they didn’t sell high, it then again maybe the word was out on him
That was the main criticism of the trade when it happened....Dahlen was worth more than Burrows, and should've fetched a much better return. What Dahlen eventually becomes is irrelevant. We sold low on a prospect that was rising in value.
Neil would have likely been more effective, cheaper and I believe younger too but not bothering to look it upSort of... I mean, Dahlen had pretty much peaked in value now that we have the benefit of hindsight. He had appeared to be progressing well, and was getting praise from various 3rd party sources, but in the end, scouting prospects isn't an exact science. We also have the benefit of hindsight with Burrows; a buyout.
Dahlen seemed to be a well regarded prospect at the time, the issue imo was more the valuation of Burrows. Dorion seemed to see him as a solution to Neil's pending retirement, so I think he saw Burrow's only being willing to waive his NTC if an extension was signed as a positive, but the reality is it should have drastically weakened Vancouver's leverage.
In the end, both teams lost the trade imo. Ottawa should have been able to get a better deal particularly with Burrows demanding an extension. Vancouver comes away empty handed as the prospect hasn't worked out so far and they moved on.
That was the main criticism of the trade when it happened....Dahlen was worth more than Burrows, and should've fetched a much better return. What Dahlen eventually becomes is irrelevant. We sold low on a prospect that was rising in value.
For some reason, Dahlen was viewed very highly in here. That trade caused a **** show in here. At the time, I remember PD on 1200 stating the internal assessment of Dahlen was that he was about our 8th best prospect.
I don't want to rehash that trade. It happened. We had an ECF run. The prospect didn't pan out. I guess sometimes the team's employees are better at assessing talent than the internet stars.
It also highlights the depth built in our system. At the time Dahlen was our 8th or so best prospect and he came nothing....we've got much more talent in the system now
Fixed that for you.Not sure if it's good assessment or just luck that both Dahlin and Stanley Cup Champion Rundblad, the next coming of Karlsson both didn't pan out. Not that Burrows was a steal in the deal like Turris was though.