Mobiandi
Registered User
- Jan 17, 2015
- 20,949
- 17,321
Top line: Gaudreau-ROR-StoneSomeone should put together an ‘all almost’ roster so we can all feel bad.
Top line: Gaudreau-ROR-StoneSomeone should put together an ‘all almost’ roster so we can all feel bad.
Matt Murray in net.... am I doing this right?
Raanta, Talbot (back when he went to EDM).... Basically we are in on everyone because Tre is always working the phones, so I think it gets blown out of proportionBen Bishop
MAF
Freddie Andersen
Someone should put together an ‘all almost’ roster so we can all feel bad.
so which unmotivated bottom dwelling team will muster up some sort of half assed effort to win tonight.
man..as bad as Monahan has been this year with him out of the line up our team really really sucks as opposed to just really sucks.
Not sure why Valimaki, Mackey, Phillips, Ruzicka arent playing.
Its not like Stone, Ritchie, Leivo, Nesterov are long term solutions and hell why not sit Gio/Tanev as well.
We didn't make the playoffs time to give the kids a chance.
Kucherov - Point - Stone
Gaudreau - Bennett - Panarin
Tkachuk - Barzal - Brown
Zucker - Kadri - Mangiapane
Giordano-Fox
Kylington-P. Myers
(Actual Cap Space)-Dobson
Bishop
Andersen
Not happening,
I think Point is more a he was still available when we picked in the 3rd round, so not a tied to but a what if.Were we ever tied to Point? I don't recall Flames honing in on him like Panarin or Kucherov.
Flames weren't in on Barzal, they were in on Chabot, which makes the defence look about 1000000000x times better.
Without Point and Barzal, the centre depth is about as good as it is today; but those wings are insane. Like, repugnantly insane.
Do we have Tkachuk if we have Bishop? Or are you using Bishop trade 2.0 as the guideline?
Calgary kid, picked 15 spots after the Flames took Brandon Hickey. Should have been a FlameWere we ever tied to Point? I don't recall Flames honing in on him like Panarin or Kucherov.
Were we ever tied to Point? I don't recall Flames honing in on him like Panarin or Kucherov.
Flames weren't in on Barzal, they were in on Chabot, which makes the defence look about 1000000000x times better.
Not really the same, but that draft was a disaster because Burke came in and basically imposed his size philosophy. Had Feaster or an independent Treliving been our GM, I don't see how Hunter Smith would have been taken with that draft pick. Maybe we don't take Point, but he was also a local guy with some pretty killer metrics. He does fit our drafting MO in every year outside of 2014 - the "Burke Draft"
What you're forgetting is that the Flames were picking 15th, and Barzal was projected to go 6th or 7th despite all the injuries he sustained in his draft year. So the rumours about the Flames were about players who'd be expected to be available.
Barzal falling to 15 (and ultimately 16) was something no one really saw coming. Even if Chabot was who they "expected" to take, that doesn't mean they'd have passed up a chance to take the WHL kid who was injured all year and had previously been discussed as a top three, top five pick.
Play the kids ffs. I've watched enough Nikita Nesterov for one lifetime.
The hyping of Matthew Phillips reminds me of the way Dustin Boyd was overhyped back in the day,