The Panther
Registered User
To answer the OP's question, "Yes, I think so."
I think League-average sort of scoring levels are "about right". By average, I mean levels that correlate to a historical sort of average, going back to 1924 or whenever. So, the early 1950s was too low scoring, the early 1980s too high scoring, and the early 2000s (and five or six years ago) too low scoring again. When the higher-scoring era was transitioning to the Dead-puck era, it hit a medium level of scoring that seemed 'about right' to me, which was maybe the 1996-97 season in isolate. Before that, it was too high and after that it was too low.
(Checks the stats. It seems 1997 was actually marginally lower-scoring than 2018, but 2019 so far is on pace for a higher scoring year than 1997 so, yeah, last season + this season is about the same level scoring as 1996-97.)
So it's a good sign that average scoring levels are up again. But what's really fun for me is that certain teams and the most elite players can really fill the net. I mean, it's one thing if average levels are slightly up, but that's not necessarily exciting if every team's leading scorer just goes from 84 points to 88 points. But what is exciting is that Kucherov, McDavid, Rantanen and whoever might each end up with 125 points this season! That gets fun. What's also exciting is that Calgary and Tampa (others?) are on pace for over 300 goals, which hasn't happened since the Capitals in 2010 and rarely since 2006 (and prior to that, rarely since about 1998).
I think League-average sort of scoring levels are "about right". By average, I mean levels that correlate to a historical sort of average, going back to 1924 or whenever. So, the early 1950s was too low scoring, the early 1980s too high scoring, and the early 2000s (and five or six years ago) too low scoring again. When the higher-scoring era was transitioning to the Dead-puck era, it hit a medium level of scoring that seemed 'about right' to me, which was maybe the 1996-97 season in isolate. Before that, it was too high and after that it was too low.
(Checks the stats. It seems 1997 was actually marginally lower-scoring than 2018, but 2019 so far is on pace for a higher scoring year than 1997 so, yeah, last season + this season is about the same level scoring as 1996-97.)
So it's a good sign that average scoring levels are up again. But what's really fun for me is that certain teams and the most elite players can really fill the net. I mean, it's one thing if average levels are slightly up, but that's not necessarily exciting if every team's leading scorer just goes from 84 points to 88 points. But what is exciting is that Kucherov, McDavid, Rantanen and whoever might each end up with 125 points this season! That gets fun. What's also exciting is that Calgary and Tampa (others?) are on pace for over 300 goals, which hasn't happened since the Capitals in 2010 and rarely since 2006 (and prior to that, rarely since about 1998).