Any Doubt who the GOAT is?

Quid Pro Clowe

Registered User
Dec 28, 2008
52,301
9,174
530
His team winning a defensive battle is hardly proof he's the goat. That was done in the past.

Rams had a great plan on defense and he's lucky his team did, too.
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
40,677
17,049
Mulberry Street
This is probably the dumbest thing I've ever heard Brady does more with less...yet we just saw them win the SB with the other team scoring 3 points and their offense hardly did anything and Brady didn't even come close to winning MVP in that game...hes had a dominant offensive line every year of his career and their running game was dominant the whole playoff run as well."OUTSIDE OF RANDY MOSS" is absolutely hilarious considering Moss is probably the 2nd best receiver in the history of the game yet you claim he hardly had anybody which makes this basically a joke. He's had better receivers than any other QB but the 49ers duo...and Welker was also just as good when he played with Manning when Manning broke the TD record in Denver.

Yea... he had Randy Moss for what, 3 seasons? That was literally the only time in his 18 year career that he had one of the best receivers in the NFL. He has played with cast off after cast off and managed to not only win 6 championships, but compile the most wins ever and could retire with the most yards/TDs of all time. As for the running game -- hes also never had a featured RB on his team.... pretty sure Michel was the first RB Belichik ever used a 1st round pick on. He's always gone for later picks like Lewis & White or signed guys like Blount.

Lol better receivers than any other QB.... are you for real? Manning, Brees and Warner all had much better weapons and thats just 3 QBs from his era.

Welker was a scrap heap pick up. The Fins didnt want him, Belichik traded for him and Brady made him into a very good receiver, one who parlayed his time with Brady into a nice free agent deal with the Broncos. Obviously he was just as good with Manning... Peyton is also an elite/all time great.
 

berklon

Registered User
Dec 24, 2008
1,543
360
People keep pointing to Brady having Moss, but guess what... they only made the SB once with Randy Moss... and they lost that game.

Brady/Patriots didn't have a stud WR in the 6 seasons they won the SB.
 

YEM

Registered User
Mar 7, 2010
5,718
2,697
Brady is so obviously the best that it's fairly absurd to argue otherwise
he does nothing but win, through a few different eras now & he owns virtually every team in the league outside of the Giants
 

tony d

Registered User
Jun 23, 2007
76,594
4,555
Behind A Tree
Nope, it is him. It was him after the Super Bowl win in 2017. Anything he does now only adds to his greatness. To think he was an injury replacement in 2001. If that injury doesn't happen who knows what happens?
 

Panthaz89

Buffalo Sabres, Carolina Panthers fan
Dec 24, 2016
13,305
5,805
Buffalo,NY
Yea... he had Randy Moss for what, 3 seasons? That was literally the only time in his 18 year career that he had one of the best receivers in the NFL. He has played with cast off after cast off and managed to not only win 6 championships, but compile the most wins ever and could retire with the most yards/TDs of all time. As for the running game -- hes also never had a featured RB on his team.... pretty sure Michel was the first RB Belichik ever used a 1st round pick on. He's always gone for later picks like Lewis & White or signed guys like Blount.

Lol better receivers than any other QB.... are you for real? Manning, Brees and Warner all had much better weapons and thats just 3 QBs from his era.

Welker was a scrap heap pick up. The Fins didnt want him, Belichik traded for him and Brady made him into a very good receiver, one who parlayed his time with Brady into a nice free agent deal with the Broncos. Obviously he was just as good with Manning... Peyton is also an elite/all time great.
Brees had "much better weapons" like who? Colston? Saints had one of the top offenses in the league but they didn't exactly have a great WR for most of Brees career. I definitely hate the Saints but Brees has had way less than Brady especially when it came to the defense considering they had the worst defense in so many seasons of his career where they would go 8-8 despite having one of if not the best offense in the league.
 

Panthaz89

Buffalo Sabres, Carolina Panthers fan
Dec 24, 2016
13,305
5,805
Buffalo,NY
People keep pointing to Brady having Moss, but guess what... they only made the SB once with Randy Moss... and they lost that game.

Brady/Patriots didn't have a stud WR in the 6 seasons they won the SB.
Cool its more important to have a great D, dominant offensive line than it is to have a stud WR............at least towards winning that is. Brady wasn't putting up any gaudy numbers til he got good receivers so its not exactly rocket science but its much easier to win in the NFL with a dominant O-line and defenses that receivers.
 

Dr Pepper

Registered User
Dec 9, 2005
70,560
15,726
Sunny Etobicoke
Brees had "much better weapons" like who? Colston? Saints had one of the top offenses in the league but they didn't exactly have a great WR for most of Brees career. I definitely hate the Saints but Brees has had way less than Brady especially when it came to the defense considering they had the worst defense in so many seasons of his career where they would go 8-8 despite having one of if not the best offense in the league.

Brees IS the weapon.....and he would've likely done far more damage than the meager amount we saw from Goff last night.
 

CHfan1

Registered User
Apr 23, 2012
8,033
9,278
Steve Young replaced him and the 49ers didnt miss a beat.

Replace Brady and lets see how many Lombardi's the Pats win (0).

Do you really think that if Peyton Manning was on the Pats, with Belichick at the helm still, that they wouldn’t have won any Super Bowls?
 

Blitzkrug

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
25,785
7,633
Winnipeg
Brees had "much better weapons" like who? Colston? Saints had one of the top offenses in the league but they didn't exactly have a great WR for most of Brees career. I definitely hate the Saints but Brees has had way less than Brady especially when it came to the defense considering they had the worst defense in so many seasons of his career where they would go 8-8 despite having one of if not the best offense in the league.

Brees did have Jimmy Graham for two seasons, who was otherworldly. But outside of that, Michael Thomas is the only other big money target he's had. Brees made a lot of average to below average WRs look a hell of a lot better than they were.
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
40,677
17,049
Mulberry Street
Do you really think that if Peyton Manning was on the Pats, with Belichick at the helm still, that they wouldn’t have won any Super Bowls?

9x one-and-done Manning probably would have won at least one with Belichik at the helm but would he have been able to produce with the modest group of players he'd have compared to what he had on the Colts?

Theres a good chance Manning would have won at least once if he replaces Brady but then again Manning wasn't really that great or impressive in any of his 3 Super Bowls.
 

Newsworthy

Registered User
Jan 28, 2018
4,253
982
USA
Brees did have Jimmy Graham for two seasons, who was otherworldly. But outside of that, Michael Thomas is the only other big money target he's had. Brees made a lot of average to below average WRs look a hell of a lot better than they were.
They both played with Cooks. Last year Pays made AN with Cooks and this year Cooks on Rams.
Colston was a great receiver also.
Also NO has had some really good runningnacks.
 

Hank Chinaski

Registered User
May 29, 2007
20,804
3,015
YFO
BB will always deserve more credit for the pats success than brady

Yesterday's game and this season in general is the definitive case against that theory.

Brady was mediocre at best yesterday, and mainly played the role of a caretaker QB this season. Would anyone have ranked the Pats D as more than a middle of the pack unit from a talent perspective? This title - along with their first against the Rams - are mostly Belichick's.
 

Hank Chinaski

Registered User
May 29, 2007
20,804
3,015
YFO
Nope, it is him. It was him after the Super Bowl win in 2017. Anything he does now only adds to his greatness. To think he was an injury replacement in 2001. If that injury doesn't happen who knows what happens?

The Mo Lewis hit on Drew Bledsoe is etched in sports folklore, but Brady wouldn't have stayed on the bench for very long. Bledsoe's contract was up at the end of that season, and there were already rumblings early that season that Bledsoe's starting job was in jeopardy.
 

CHfan1

Registered User
Apr 23, 2012
8,033
9,278
9x one-and-done Manning probably would have won at least one with Belichik at the helm but would he have been able to produce with the modest group of players he'd have compared to what he had on the Colts?

Theres a good chance Manning would have won at least once if he replaces Brady but then again Manning wasn't really that great or impressive in any of his 3 Super Bowls.

So you think Belichik’s success is only because of Brady and he never would have won anything without him?
 

Roboturner913

Registered User
Jul 3, 2012
25,853
55,526
They both played with Cooks. Last year Pays made AN with Cooks and this year Cooks on Rams.
Colston was a great receiver also.
Also NO has had some really good runningnacks.

The Saints offense until recently was about having a large quantity of pretty good but not great players who filled a niche. Even when some guys put up superstar level numbers they weren't elite players. They were elite within the niche they filled but not overall. Like Graham may have been a great pass-catching TE but he was never a great overall TE. Colston was a great jump ball and possession WR but was never a great overall WR. Pierre Thomas was great at screens and blitz pickup but not a great overall RB. Etc. etc. Arguably Thomas and Kamara are the first guys Brees has played with since he came to the Saints that have a legitimate claim to being top 5 players at their positions - maybe Graham, but I was always a little more down on Graham than a lot of people even when he was putting up monster numbers.

Kinda the same with Brady, he had Gronk and Moss but overall he's been making names for guys like Edelman, Amendola, Branch, Troy Brown, Welker, etc. who are great when they're in a great situation but don't have a talent level to be as productive in another situation.
 

Bocephus86

Registered User
Mar 2, 2011
6,189
3,711
Boston
The only argument that I need anymore to defend Brady as the GOAT is to point to the "counter arguments" that are being posted in this thread. They are so desperate, so myopic, so contradictory, that anyone who reads them will say: "Well, if that's what they got against it, he has to be the GOAT. "

I appreciate all the help guys.

And he was solidified after ATL. This years run just adds icing to the cake (I'd point to the KC game over this one, but he, again, did enough to deliver the win while, again, taking the Pats on a game winning 4th quarter drive).
 

GordonGecko

First Ping Pong Ball
Oct 28, 2010
9,049
1,030
New York City
Yesterday's game and this season in general is the definitive case against that theory.

Brady was mediocre at best yesterday, and mainly played the role of a caretaker QB this season. Would anyone have ranked the Pats D as more than a middle of the pack unit from a talent perspective? This title - along with their first against the Rams - are mostly Belichick's.
Brady was hardly a 'caretaker' vs KC. He is declining, no doubt, but remember the guy is 41 lol - yet one more ring.
 

Hank Chinaski

Registered User
May 29, 2007
20,804
3,015
YFO
Brady was hardly a 'caretaker' vs KC. He is declining, no doubt, but remember the guy is 41 lol - yet one more ring.

Not using that as any kind of slight. I've watched the Pats since Brady's first start, and this season was much closer to the Brady of 2001-04 than what we've seen recently. 'Caretaker' may be too strong, I'm not saying he was Chad Pennington or Alex Smith. But far less was placed on his shoulders than in the past.
 

Fantomas

Registered User
Aug 7, 2012
13,299
6,630
Wow, an entire 4-page thread about how Brady is GOAT without a single (apparent) mention of either Jim Brown or Jerry Rice. A buncha real historians here.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad