#2 central. Can't legitimately place league wide standings when all the games are intra division. So tier 2 makes sense with a distinct possibility that we're in Schrodinger's tier 1
That's where I am. It's a weak division, and Tampa and Carolina are clearly a tier above the rest, at least on paper. Tampa and the Canes spend the entire season beating up on a fairly weak division, and that should allow both teams to rack up points. Do I think the Canes will actually be a top 5 team in the NHL? Borderline maybe, but I think we'll have a more than decent shot at a top 5 point total.Due to the division, I would not be shocked if we have a Top 5 point total by the end of the year. I think its a 2-way battle between us and Tampa for division champions with a glut of teams battling it out for the other playoff spots. We will finish closer to the top of the division than the playoff cut line.
Not sure where you're going with this. Playoffs will be all division based until they get to the 3rd round. So 8 teams in the central division, 4 will make it and play each other. Vegas and Colorado are in the west division, completely irrelevant to the central.I had to go 2. Mostly because I assume Vegas and Colorado will only lose to each other, the rest of that division is just awful. so now you only have 3 spots left. Tampa, and I assume one team from each other division. So we finish 6th.
I think he was talking about the “top 5 in the NHl” option.Not sure where you're going with this. Playoffs will be all division based until they get to the 3rd round. So 8 teams in the central division, 4 will make it and play each other. Vegas and Colorado are in the west division, completely irrelevant to the central.
Ahhhh i see. My badI think he was talking about the “top 5 in the NHl” option.
+1 for the ö+1 for a Schrödinger's cat reference in a hockey forum, lol.
+1 for a Schrödinger's cat reference in a hockey forum, lol.
+1 for the ö
Ahhhh i see. My bad
I honestly believed even if we finished 2nd to Tampa we would be in that range. Considering where Florida finished, guess that could have been correct. I thought the division was bad enough at the bottom for that to happen.Gratz to
@VAcaniac
@cptjeff
@storm636
@Azor Aho
@Highway29
@zman77
@Bunch of Jurcos
@Svechhammer
@Andrew H
@Daeavorn
@AhosDatsyukian
for being unrealistically optimistic enough to get this question right.
Gratz to
@VAcaniac
@cptjeff
@storm636
@Azor Aho
@Highway29
@zman77
@Bunch of Jurcos
@Svechhammer
@Andrew H
@Daeavorn
@AhosDatsyukian
for being unrealistically optimistic enough to get this question right.
Gee, I wonder what could possibly explain that total that got it correct going from 11 to 12?why’d you leave me out? That’s my vote also.
No idea. Must be a glitch in the Matrix.Gee, I wonder what could possibly explain that total that got it correct going from 11 to 12?
Tampa is clearly the class of the division, but the extent to which the Bolts will put their foot on the gas pedal in the regular season is a question. Of the previous 10 cup winners pre-Tampa, only 3 won the division the following year (St. Louis going by P%, Washington and Boston).
Gratz to
@VAcaniac
@cptjeff
@storm636
@Azor Aho
@Highway29
@zman77
@Bunch of Jurcos
@Svechhammer
@Andrew H
@Daeavorn
@AhosDatsyukian
for being unrealistically optimistic enough to get this question right.
Yeah my prediction before the season was that we would be a Top 5 team in the league, but that was because I thought the Central was a 2 headed monster with a bunch of underperforming muck below Tampa and Carolina. Yeah, so I got the first part right, we were a Top 3 team, so yay me. But we did that in a division with 3 elite teams, another 2 really good teams, Chicago who was surprisingly good, and two stinkers.Make that 3 in 11.
Tampa did win at a ~110 point pace. The foot was firmly on the gas. Carolina and Florida were just better.