turnbuckle said:Someone mentioned recently that Mueller should just go to Everett to play instead of spending the season in the USHL, but if you were 16 years old - would you really rather go way out west far from family and friends to play in Everett, or stay close to home, and then join some buddies on what promises to be a powerhouse Minny team and receive a quality education? I'd pick the latter if I was him. Most talented prospects in Canada don't get that chance though. They are told through the drafts where they are going, and they obey like trusty lapdogs.
Chootoi said:i was thinking about the whole "letter of intent" thing and came up with this other solution:
what if, come training camp time, all players who don't report to their respective teams become some type of restricted free agent. any team is welcome to talk to a 'holdout' player and/or sign him, however a hefty compensation must be paid to the team owning his rights. either cash or draft picks. if it is picks it should be something big like your next 2 or 3 first rounders (something similar to the NHL's 5 first round picks compensation).
so if a team wants a guy bad enough, they can have him... for a price
thoughts?
RyanM said:Yeah, Roy traded up thinking he was taking a gamble
Roy knew when he made the pick that Esposito would be a Rempart in the fall.
Russian Fan said:While I understand your point & I agree with it. Great junior players can do what they want & if the CHL make rules to make sure the best player got to go where he's GOT TO BE draft, they can lose a lot of good players to the NCAA. the CHL is a tough league where regular players earn 85$ a week, play 70 games a year + playoffs & even if they can go to school the hockey rhythm makes most pf the players fall out of it & some great journalism showed that even if the teams says they have some teachers that are with the team, they know they dont focus on schools so the NCAA route is a good way to have a diploma & play on weekend.
So if they need 100K or 500K or a million to make them play, I think it's good for once that some money$ goes to the players instead of the owners who are making A LOT OF DOUGH by exploiting this kids.
timlap said:I have a hard time getting mad at 16 year olds for the decisions they make reagrding their athletic careers.
stocktrader said:No one had more bargaining power than Crosby.
Rimouski was the worst team in the league. Did you see him pull this lame ass stunt?
alecfromtherock said:From a Dog Devils perspective there would have been little chance that Angelo Esposito would be drafted by the team as Saint John had the #1 pick.
Hockey does not benefit from players getting what they want without any checks and balances.
Offering to pay for an collage education is one thing, but giving a 16 year old kid $1,000,000 to join the Ramparts is a tad ridiculous.
If any proof of ‘buying’ Angelo comes out then the Ramparts, even with Roy, then that organisation will here an ear-full from the other 17 teams(especially the expansion teams)
Wanting to play in a certain city is one thing, but receiving money for doing so has SELLOUT written all over it.
You mean like Rimouski tanking their season so they could be desperate enough to become dead-last place and be a lock at the #1 pick?
As for lame ass stunts:
Crosby, no
Rimouski, yes
Didn’t Washington have a fire-sale for AO/ Pittsburgh tanked to get Super Mario?
GoSSCHgo said:Plus, more money coming into the league with a star playing for a contending team -- Hello Sydney -- helps everyone. Le Colisee will add 2,000 to 3,000 per game, and other rinks will fill when the Remparts come to town.
Rahan said:Angelo Esposito won't be filling buildings. He's no superstar, he's only the top prospect. His numbers at Shattuck aren't as impressive as they would be if he were so special (ala Crosby). I haven't seen him play but I doubt he'll but such a force in his first year and I really don't think he will be the one filling buildings.
GoSSCHgo said:An expansion team is going to rock Esposito? Yeah, ri-i-i-g-h-t! A team with no talent is going to threaten one of the league's top three franchises?
Get real. What you need to pray for is that the losses for your team won't be in the double digits because Quebec in 2005-06 will be the Oceanic in 2004-05.
Moreover, a top player wouldn't leave Shattuck for an Expansion team. The Fog Devils and/or the Sea Dogs may have drafted him, but he would have been moved in a multi-player deal somewhere else. Why? Because expansion teams or other bottom feeders need three to four years to make it to the top of the rankings. . .and Espo will only be in this league for two years, three at the most.
Plus, more money coming into the league with a star playing for a contending team -- Hello Sydney -- helps everyone. Le Colisee will add 2,000 to 3,000 per game, and other rinks will fill when the Remparts come to town.
Last but not least, had he stayed with an expansion team, he would only play one away game in the Quebec rinks (with the new divisional setup).
The Espositos did what was best for Angelo, that's their job. Patrick Roy did what was best for his team. That's his job.
There are no losers here. And I have a feeling that this season, or next season, Angie will be getting the same kind of attention that Sydney got. . .and the league will be jumping.
La-La-Laprise said:No offense inteded but the Remps wont contend next year. They have a swiss cheese defense and their offense is pretty much the same as last year.