Steeler23
Registered User
- Aug 10, 2004
- 1,022
- 1,041
Proof that Markov is better than Kulak?!! If you seriously think Kulak is better than Markov then this discussion is futile.
And for the last time, stop repeating things that make no sense. Nothing of significance happens between 38 and 40 to your body, it does NOT just shut down one morning on the day of your 40th birthday and suddenly you can't do what you were capable of doing 2 years ago.
"Make the NHL by 18, retire by 25 or you'll find yourself labeled a bust and old and decrepit, respectively." The classic HF line of thought.
I'm saying that he's probably not as good as 2 years ago because he's 40, but you give an example that if you don't retire at 25 yo, you are a bust and old. THAT'S a classic HF there. Taking a somewhat logical statement and turning it into the most absurd statement possible (How many 40 years old play in the NHL, because there should be an equal number of 40 and 38 yo, because your body doesn't change at that age. And how many players in history made a comeback in the NHL after 2 years away, at 40 yo?).
I'm ALL for a PTO. I said it a couple month ago when the 1st rumor about him wanting to play again started. But only a PTO until he prove he have a place, because NOBODY have seen him play at the NHL level in the last 2 years, and that's a fact. But you want to make fun of me because I think present Kulak is probably superior or at least even to present Markov (I'll add PRESENT, because you seem to think I'm comparing each players at their prime).