Djoos sounds like he has a similar style to...Marcus Pettersson.
Great asset management BM.
Great asset management BM.
Yeah, and then got hurt last year I think because of a skate laceration. I'm really intrigued to watch him play.Should add that Djoos played for their entire Cup run, we may not have done that bad here.
Dare we hope that he's as good as Joe DiPenta?Should add that Djoos played for their entire Cup run, we may not have done that bad here.
What a twist.Djoos sounds like he has a similar style to...Marcus Pettersson.
Great asset management BM.
More indifferent. Djoos likely wanted a fresh start and has been passed by Siegenthaler & Fehervary but Sprong is a rather marked down asset as well. Of course, Djoos also has cleared waivers and counted slightly against the cap while in the AHL.Really interesting that caps fans aren't all that happy with this trade. Excited to watch djoos play.
To my understanding, he really doesn't have much left to prove down in the A. Would that be fair to assume?More indifferent. Djoos likely wanted a fresh start and has been passed by Siegenthaler & Fehervary but Sprong is a rather marked down asset as well. Of course, Djoos also has cleared waivers and counted slightly against the cap while in the AHL.
Djoos is very physically slight but does carry some NHL upside due to his hockey sense. His vision and passing are pretty strong. Probably no more than a 5 but for a rebuilding team it makes all kind of sense to give him a shot down the stretch.
To my understanding, he really doesn't have much left to prove down in the A. Would that be fair to assume?
Djoos will be given the chance to try and prove he can stick over Larsson. And if Larsson keeps playing like he does, I wouldn't be surprised if he could.
Sprong is...Sprong. The upside is undeniable, but I always took him to be a boom-or-bust prospect, and it's looking like it's a bust.
Does it matter if he was never going to crack this lineup because of a coach, or because he was defensively lacking? I'd argue not, unless people genuinely thought Sprong would have stuck around to either wait out Eakins or make it based on another 8 games (which seems to be all that Eakins is willing to give).another whatever trade. I still wish we knew more of why Sprong was never really given a chance here. I know his defensive woes were touted, but he could score goals and always shot the puck on net... which half of this team can't even do.
Lol people are acting like Sprong was going to solve this teams woes. If we should’ve kept Sprong, we should’ve kept Aberg when he was here!
The thing that really annoys me about the Sprong acquisition is just WTF was Bob thinking? Sprong's deficiencies were well know when we acquired him. You don't go out and trade for a guy with those warts if you don't have a plan to help him get rid of the warts. You have to think you're smarter than the average bear (in how to fix him) in order to want him. Yeah, sure they gave him some feedback/guidance. But looking at his usage, it's hard to think they did much more than just criticize his faults and tell him to do better. And when that didn't happen last year they just threw up their hands this year and gave up on him right from the start.
I'm really beginning to wonder if we have a f*cking clue on how to develop young players.