MattyNew91
Registered User
- Jul 5, 2018
- 126
- 22
Nonsense. A low first isn’t “a first”. It’s a low first and carries significantly less value than a first in the lottery. And Liljegren is spare parts. Kerfoot is definitely spare parts. Neither one of them carry much value. Kerfoot almost none. Dermott doesn’t carry a lot of value either. These are just throw in pieces to any large deal.
here you go for a counter Rackell and Manson at 50% retention for Nylander and Dermott.
Toronto has zero “great” prospects. You’ve got two good prospects in Sandin and Robertson. Liljegren is a meh prospect.
Honestly that is alot to give up sorry. We don't need Manson. These are not spare parts besides kerfoot. First off with this past draft the leafs prospect pool is solid. If you did some reading on the leafs prospects you will understand. Amirov we just drafted very good prospect and Topi Niemela was just awarded top defenseman at the world juniors and there's more prospects to talk about but moving on. Liljegren doubled his points last year from 15 points in 43 games to 30 points in 40 games. While playing top pair as a 20 year old. If you watch Dermott the kid will be a top 4 dman he won't get an opportunity unless someone gets hurt for us in the top 4. He's very poised with the puck makes smart plays offensively and defensively. He's not small but not big he's 6feet 205. Skates very well. But you guys are loaded on the left side but he can play the right side as well. With the 1st round pick not sure where you think your going to get a lottery pick when a team thats acquiring Rackell will be a playoff team. If you got a 1st+ Liljegren/Dermott + Engvall for Rakell 50% retained I'd say good trade for both sides. Similar to the Coleman trade. But even after all of this not sure the ducks have cap room to retain so not it works unless kerfoot is involved.
Last edited: