lawrence
Registered User
- May 19, 2012
- 15,981
- 6,763
Canucks? Please.
absolutely not. Burnaby boy yes, but 4,625,000 dollar cap until 2022, huge pass.
Canucks? Please.
absolutely not. Burnaby boy yes, but 4,625,000 dollar cap until 2022, huge pass.
We can put him on waivers next season.
We can put him on waivers next season.
We can put him on waivers next season.
You do realize you still have to pay him his money if he clears? Bergevin would cry out of joy if the Canucks actually claimed him.
I'm thinking this might be a jab at management or the old management in some way.
Bergevin should be on waivers next for signing this stupid ****in contract in the first place.
A lot of people saw this contract being a problem coming.
A lot of free agency contracts are..
I remember thinking that i would have rather paid Markov 1M extra to keep him, but i thought Alzner would probably fit with Petry (DD and OD)
boy was i wrong!
Was there one person except for Bergevin who thought this was a good contract?
Markov would have been so much better! You can take his legs away but you can't take that vision away!
Couldn't afford Radulov and Markov, rather pay Alzner instead.
I think the worst of it is that i thought it was a betrayal in some ways.. The guy could have had his 1000 games in mtl.
Nah, you can always trade bad contract for bad contract. Who else in NJ has a bad contract besides Schneider? MTL can't really pay 16M for two goalies...Since he cleared waivers, indicating that no organization has interest, can MTL fans stop forcing Alzner on the rest of us?
Thanks.
Since he cleared waivers, indicating that no organization has interest, can MTL fans stop forcing Alzner on the rest of us?
Thanks.