Proposal: All Bruins Trade Proposals VII

Status
Not open for further replies.

Blowfish

Count down ...
Jan 13, 2005
22,825
14,828
Southwestern Ontario
Boy that's a tough one. I think I would be inclined to pass -- mainly because I think they are such similar players that the add wouldn't be huge and I think you get rid of young kids like JDB very very carefully. He's a big game performer and about the most enthusiastic kid you're going to find.

1) They are almost the exact same player. Tuch is significantly bigger and more physical but Debrusk is quicker.
2) Tuch is 23 and has a new 7 year contract at $4.75M. Debrusk is RFA this year and I expect will get a contract similar to Tuch's.
3) Tuch RS Stats: 174 GP - 40G - 59 A 99 Pts. Debrusk RS Stats: 164 GP - 50G - 49A - 99 Pts.
4) Tuch PO Stats: 27 GP - 7G - 5A 12 Pts. Debrusk PO Stats: 36 GP - 10G - 9A - 19 Pts.

PlayerRS G/GPRS A/GPRS Pts/GP
Debrusk.305.299.604
Tuch.230.339.569
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
PlayerPO G/GPPO A/GPPO Pts/GP
Debrusk.278.250.528
Tuch.259.185.444
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Debrusk has edge on offense but the very similar. Of course Tuch has 4 inches and 40 pounds on JDB. Not surprisingly that translates into a more physical game. Tuch has 212 hits over 174 games while JDB 127 hits over 164 Games.

It's why I suck at these things. I want Tuch AND Debrusk.

Debrusk is a bruin he ain't going anywhere soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beapin and bbfan419

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,084
20,842
Tyler, TX
He was....the deal he signed with Buffalo was very reasonable....grrrrr

Yes, it was a decent deal for him, but money the Bruins did not have to spend. If that was what he was looking for, viewing the team cap situation, I am not surprised they passed. It's too bad- this is the Backes deal paying the wrong sort of dividends.
 

Tbaybruin

Registered User
Feb 2, 2016
3,894
4,209
If Buffalo drops out reaquire MoJo

he’s on a great contract and was only their best forward against St Louis
That’s why Sweeney should have moved Backes. If the cost was a first and a prospect do it then sign MoJo to the 4 mil a year deal and you have 2 extra million. Now you have to pay for players. All I can think of is Sweeney tried and it was a brutal high price like 2 firsts
 
  • Like
Reactions: RussellmaniaKW

bbfan419

Registered User
Jul 3, 2006
8,899
9,315
Moncton NB
I agree that it would make sense to trade from an area of strength to bolster the forwards. And in general I agree. However, my worry about Vaak is that he's not a required protection for the Seattle draft. I think if you add a guy like Tuch (who you'd obviously have to protect) you'd have to send back a guy that would otherwise be on that protect list (Gryz, Krug - depending on contract, etc).
For sure if we could trade Grizz in a package instead of Vaak that would be preferable.
 

bbfan419

Registered User
Jul 3, 2006
8,899
9,315
Moncton NB
The thing with Heinen is, and I'll say first I don't know enough about the Bruins cap situation to know if they can fit everyone without moving out a contract, is what if they Bruins strike out trying to move one of Backes/Moore/Miller and they need cap space to accommodate a 23-man roster. What do they do then? For me it then falls on Heinen, simply due to his salary. Now they won't give him away, but they could get backed into a corner depending on where they are with the salary cap.
They could also just put Backes on Waivers.
 

bbfan419

Registered User
Jul 3, 2006
8,899
9,315
Moncton NB
Pipe dreams included, your list is really close in my book - I have Kreider as number four but would like to add Rakell (just above Kreider).

1. Tuch (Grizz + Heinen will not be enough I believe - Lauzon and Studnicka + 3:rd maybe) I say pay up!
2. E. Lindholm (they´d be complete fools to sell, but if so... same deal as above) I say pay up!
3. Rakell (a sensible mix of size, work ethic and skill)
4. Palmieri / Kreider
5. Pageau
6. Anderson
7. Kase
8. Toffoli
9. Coleman (? for me)

The way I see it, Vaaks is the most important youth talent for us (as a future replacement for Chara, and though loosing Studnicka would be a noticeable blow to our future core, geting Lindholm would remove that pain - especially since Beecher seems to have quite some potential after some molding (could very well be one of the smartest draft picks in a long time and man our 2:nd C for years to come).

Lindholm would be a great addition long term, with the option of moving Coyle to 2:nd RW, but Tuch´s size is a more dire need for our cup run.

What about Calle Järnkrok as a 3:rd C (Coyle 2:nd RW), if Nashville want´s to shake things up and refill talent - his contract is sweet, so I guess it would cost, but I see him as an under estimated player.
I don't want to trade Studnicka, I would include Frederic and another prospect instead. I think Vegas though would be very interested in Grizz and why not?
 

CellyHard

Registered User
May 27, 2012
981
1,632
Massachusetts
Ducks have been scouting the Bruins
Ducks have an abundance of right wings
Ducks could use a top four offensive defensemen
Bruins might be looking to ‘dump a contract’

I can see something being worked out around Kase for Moore. It would make sense that he’s been showcased the last three games.

Might not be the RH power play specialist that they’re looking for but I think it’s important to consider they’re going to keep Lindholm, Manson Fowler during expansion. Krug and Gryz don’t really make sense considering what they would have to pay them as well.

Kase’s value is pretty darn low right now and has the skill to slot easily into the top 6 with Krejci. If he gets hurt or it doesn’t pan out go back to the drawing board with picks and prospects for a rental at the TDL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbfan419

Mick Riddleton

“A day without sunshine is like, you know, night.”
Apr 24, 2017
14,096
15,141
Niagara
They could have simply re-signed him and spent some of JJ's billion, instead of then having to give up assets for him.

I don't think Buffalo is going to send him here under any circumstances anyway.


I would love to just simply sign Mojo and spend JJs money. You need to fit under the cap. We lost Mojo because we have Backes contract strangling us. He could not be fit in at this time.

Moore alone is not going to bring us a lot, his cap is only 2.75. That hardly gets us the top 6 guy we crave. If its a multi player deal and a pick well maybe, still we need to add a roster player with him to get something of value back. Maybe Moore, Heinen a pick and prospect (Cehlarik).
 
Last edited:

sleepyh

Registered User
Jun 29, 2007
1,035
764
Brattleboro
Ducks have been scouting the Bruins
Ducks have an abundance of right wings
Ducks could use a top four offensive defensemen
Bruins might be looking to ‘dump a contract’

I can see something being worked out around Kase for Moore. It would make sense that he’s been showcased the last three games.

Might not be the RH power play specialist that they’re looking for but I think it’s important to consider they’re going to keep Lindholm, Manson Fowler during expansion. Krug and Gryz don’t really make sense considering what they would have to pay them as well.

Kase’s value is pretty darn low right now and has the skill to slot easily into the top 6 with Krejci. If he gets hurt or it doesn’t pan out go back to the drawing board with picks and prospects for a rental at the TDL.

Kase next to Krejci could be pretty nice. Assuming Kase can stay healthy..
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbfan419

Mantis

I am a doctah
Mar 7, 2011
25,463
4,859
Crimetown, Saskatchewan
Try to get a 7th round pick for Ritchie and Lindholm or waive them.

Try Studnicka with Krejci and Debrusk for a few games and if its not working try aquiring someone like Palmieri.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAD BOY

neelynugs

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
35,439
9,888
Ducks have been scouting the Bruins
Ducks have an abundance of right wings
Ducks could use a top four offensive defensemen
Bruins might be looking to ‘dump a contract’

I can see something being worked out around Kase for Moore. It would make sense that he’s been showcased the last three games.

Might not be the RH power play specialist that they’re looking for but I think it’s important to consider they’re going to keep Lindholm, Manson Fowler during expansion. Krug and Gryz don’t really make sense considering what they would have to pay them as well.

Kase’s value is pretty darn low right now and has the skill to slot easily into the top 6 with Krejci. If he gets hurt or it doesn’t pan out go back to the drawing board with picks and prospects for a rental at the TDL.

love kase but there's a lot more than moore going in that deal if true. anaheim had agreed
to kase for justin faulk before faulk said no thanks on an extension which meant no deal.
is zboril and moore and whatever else enough to get kase? would be nice. kase also makes
about the same as moore so the b's would still be looking to dump dollars.
 

BadBruins

Registered User
Aug 10, 2005
9,938
1,566
PEI
I’ve tried, I’ve honestly tried with Heinen, but I’ll drive him to the airport if he’s in a package for an improvement.

I'm with you. 3rd liner making 3rd line money. Low impact player. He might be worth more to the Bruins than in a trade, but I'm not sure he has a future here. Maybe he's that guy you don't miss until he's gone, but I honestly feel like his presence isn't wanted or needed at times. Still doesn't kill penalties. Barely gets PP time. Just kind of.... there. Player without a role is always a scary thing. The lack of skating and pace are apparent though and I don't think that jives with what Cassidy is looking for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbfan419

Sheppy

Registered User
Nov 23, 2011
56,376
58,617
The Arctic
Uhhhhhhhh yeah, I hope that’s the case for everybody on the roster.........


But we get it at this point, you don’t like the player. Got it.
Good.

I think his “defensive ability” isn’t good enough to overcome his flat out lack of intensity and finish.
 

CDJ

Registered User
Nov 20, 2006
54,768
43,553
Hell baby
Good.

I think his “defensive ability” isn’t good enough to overcome his flat out lack of intensity and finish.

Boy oh boy if you think he has a flat out lack of finish then I’d hate to see what you think of Anderson this year. THATS a lack of finish
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lo97

sarge88

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 29, 2003
25,474
20,893
Boy oh boy if you think he has a flat out lack of finish then I’d hate to see what you think of Anderson this year. THATS a lack of finish

Personally, I’d rather give a guy who has already scored 27 in the NHL the benefit of the doubt that he can return to that level, than hope a guy who never has come close to that number will get there some day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tbaybruin
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad