I honestly don't even remember what Juulsen's play was like. But I do like Fleury. I thought it was a stud and was nailing anyone coming across the blue line.
Juulsen is a steady eddy in his own end. Fleury has a better game when you factor in offensive potential but Juulsen is a shut down type. Remember when Weber was hurt to start the season and Juulsen was with Reilly? He made Reilly look good. Think about that. The kid has always been a trusted option on D for every single coach he has played with.
Juulsen (Another Injured season)
- (+6) in 13 AHL games
- 3 points
Fleury
- (-5) in 14 games
- 5 pts and 2 goals
Both are very solid young guys on D with fringe top 4D potential. I think Juulsen and Romanov would be dynamic and it would allow Romanov to be a bit more offensive cause he can rely on Juulsen's defensive first game. In a bottom pairing role, they would have less pressure and can develop properly. Exactly how Tampa managed Sergachev
- In Juulsen's age 21 season he had 3 pts and 1 goal with a +1 rating in 23 games. That's when his development got derailed with those pucks to his face
- In Fleury's age 21 season this past year, he had 1 beauty of a goal in 41 games with a -4 rating.
I consider these two neck and neck in terms of value