- Aug 28, 2009
- 7,349
- 4,352
I’d say noneThink there’s any chance the blues trade his UFA Rights?
I’d say noneThink there’s any chance the blues trade his UFA Rights?
Sure it is. If teams don't have the money to pay him, he's SOL. The reason UFAs get paid is because GMs can't help themselves from bidding against one another. In normal circumstances, he would for sure get some offers of 10+, but if no teams aren't willing to spend that money due to budget constraints, he's not going to get paid.
I was thinking Bruins make a play at both Hall and Pietrangelo short term. 1 or maybe 2 years nearly fully Signing bonuses. They got for it completely for the short term and then begin a rebuild if they fail to win in those 2 years. They could get him long term but I think the Bruins would be better off addressing their top 6 then committing long term to PietrangeloWhy short term on Bruins?
No it isn’t, and this has been covered enough by guys like Bob Mackenzie that it should be common knowledge. Not only is it not an important factor to these guys, but the fact his 10M in USD is being used to purchase Canadian eliminates the gap.
If he were to hypothetically get a 10m offer from the Leafs (and I don’t think they will be pursuing him.) he will also receive a lockout proofed contract with a bonus of 15-20M.
The point is, the 10M actually has almost 13.2M buying power where he will be living. 8.5M in Vegas is still 8.5M, and without the gargantuan bonus money on top.
If they give him a final offer and he says naw, I’m testing FA, is the offer still there if he decides to stay?
I’d venture to guess buying power has almost nothing to do with a players decision UNLESS that players plans on living/retiring in that country. And even then, whether he gets 10M in Toronto, or 10M in Vegas, he’ll still have the same buying power when his hockey career is over.No it isn’t, and this has been covered enough by guys like Bob Mackenzie that it should be common knowledge. Not only is it not an important factor to these guys, but the fact his 10M in USD is being used to purchase Canadian eliminates the gap.
If he were to hypothetically get a 10m offer from the Leafs (and I don’t think they will be pursuing him.) he will also receive a lockout proofed contract with a bonus of 15-20M.
The point is, the 10M actually has almost 13.2M buying power where he will be living. 8.5M in Vegas is still 8.5M, and without the gargantuan bonus money on top.
No doubt.teams always have money for elite players. it's depth players who are gonna take a hit
Guys won’t want front loaded bonuses. Escrow is 20% and takes that out of the bonus dollars too. If a guy signs for term, they will want to back load their money to reduce the effects of escrow. Plus, lots of guys like living in the States, because they (and mostly their family) can be anonymous. Pietrangelo will either stay in St. Loo, or head to a warm spot.No it isn’t, and this has been covered enough by guys like Bob Mackenzie that it should be common knowledge. Not only is it not an important factor to these guys, but the fact his 10M in USD is being used to purchase Canadian eliminates the gap.
If he were to hypothetically get a 10m offer from the Leafs (and I don’t think they will be pursuing him.) he will also receive a lockout proofed contract with a bonus of 15-20M.
The point is, the 10M actually has almost 13.2M buying power where he will be living. 8.5M in Vegas is still 8.5M, and without the gargantuan bonus money on top.
There will be a number of teams (Sens and Coyotes for sure) looking to add contracts that have high cap hits, but little left on actual dollars paid out. So I think we see several strange looking trades until the real money saved is considered. Pietrangelo could easily end up in Vegas.No doubt.
but what makes it different this year, I think, is moving out money is going to extremely challenging.
there’s going to be a lot of teams trying to shed salary, and very few teams looking to add.
There will be a number of teams (Sens and Coyotes for sure) looking to add contracts that have high cap hits, but little left on actual dollars paid out. So I think we see several strange looking trades until the real money saved is considered. Pietrangelo could easily end up in Vegas.
What do you think revenues will be for the upcoming season?
And this is what you think should happen?A heck of a lot lower than a revenue that would generate a 81.5 million cap hit. That's for sure.
They absolutely could.The only way Toronto could do that is by trading Marner. No way they can just add 9 mil in cap.
The only way you trade Marner is by taking salary back. Kind of defeats the purpose. Easier to move smaller pieces.I'll drive marner to the airport to bring in Petey. would be nice to get a replacement top 6 rw and some solid picks/prospects for him
I was thinking Bruins make a play at both Hall and Pietrangelo short term. 1 or maybe 2 years nearly fully Signing bonuses. They got for it completely for the short term and then begin a rebuild if they fail to win in those 2 years. They could get him long term but I think the Bruins would be better off addressing their top 6 then committing long term to Pietrangelo
Ya that's another good solution for the Bs. Carlo should get a pretty good winger. Guys like reinhart(probably not a target due to contract status and buffalo not needing RHD), vrana, boesor, tuch, cirelli, seem like good targets.I think more likely they sign AP long term and move Carlo for some ELC top 6 help. No sense having Carlo on the third pair, ya know?
The only way you trade Marner is by taking salary back. Kind of defeats the purpose. Easier to move smaller pieces.
You are nuts if you think teams wouldn’t gladly trade for marner.Lol I love how people change the narrative to fit there agendas lol. Nobody is taking a 11 mil cap hit winger.