Wait, this still hadn't been announced yet?
Carolina still hasn't announced it, no. Florida spilled the beans, but Charlotte and Chicago were the only options left.
Wait, this still hadn't been announced yet?
Every time I see an update to this thread, I hope that there's an actual update, and there never is.
Well, I'd say we all want to know the story. Hopefully it comes out soon when we officially announce our plan.
If Chicago can support itself and provide more of an affiliation bonus to Carolina, where is the faceplant? Plot twist or no plot twist.
What size pipeline are we talking 500-1000 people who have developed a definite regular money spending interest? Maybe another 1000 that may be a shirt and go to game once, maybe twice a season? All together we’re looking at 150 thousand in revenue for the Canes from this pipeline, maybe. I would confidently put money down that the difference in money in a Chicago deal is more than 150k. Even if some of those fans fall off or we don’t gain a few because the pipeline is lost, the Canes still come out better on the deal.The faceplant is putting the difference in affiliation bonus ahead of the long-term growth of the Hurricanes brand and the general growth of professional and amateur hockey in North Carolina.
Make no mistake, there is a pipeline of hockey interest from Charlotte to Raleigh and vice versa. I am an example of that as are several other regular, long term forumers here.
We'll see what comes out. That Tweet would lead one to believe that Sara knows or has a good idea and thanks it's worth waiting to hear. Whether what she thinks and what comes out eventually makes us feel that way, we'll see. I'm also willing to bet they have loads of data that backs up Charlotte not being as important as it's made out. That data may prove incorrect, but I bet even with whatever story comes out, they weighed that impact as well. But hopefully we actually find out sometime this lifetime.
What size pipeline are we talking 500-1000 people who have developed a definite regular money spending interest? Maybe another 1000 that may be a shirt and go to game once, maybe twice a season? All together we’re looking at 150 thousand in revenue for the Canes from this pipeline, maybe. I would confidently put money down that the difference in money in a Chicago deal is more than 150k. Even if some of those fans fall off or we don’t gain a few because the pipeline is lost, the Canes still come out better on the deal.
I also think the call ups thing is damn near a non-factor. If Vancouver can handle Utica, among other examples over the years and currently, we can handle Chicago.
Seems to be like Dundon is a span of control guy, and he's gonna work whatever deals he needs to work to have the most control possible.
I agree that seems like Dundon's history so far.
But that makes this decision odd, because I can't think of an AHL franchise that pushes for autonomy more than the Chicago Wolves.
Like I said:
If this is about adding a few grand to the bottom line at the expense of thousands of fans, then that is a faceplant. We're talking about the kind of thing that can generationally shift a 12-year-old from being Hurricanes to being Panthers fans for the rest of their lives, or potentially even send the Checkers over the edge to relocation and eliminating that kid from being interested in hockey at all. Not to mention we're making it harder to execute callups/send-downs, and eroding team control over player development.
That's a pants-on-head stupid thing to do for an increase in the affiliation fee, in the context of an organization with a nine-figure budget.
Apparently Sara knows something that will somehow make this make sense. It must be a doozy because right now it looks really bad.
Which is why this feels like a temporary move towards a more permanent move to a situation over which Dundon has more control. Team purchase/relocation seems like one possibility, especially since COVID times might put some AHL orgs under serious stress; I'm sure there are others.