News Article: According to Pierre McGuire, Wings frontrunners for Krug

Henkka

Registered User
Jan 31, 2004
31,187
12,166
Tampere, Finland
I thought McIsaac was at least 2 yrs away?

Your point about Cholo being a future Top 4 PMD/PP specialist/trade chip is accurate, however how do you justify all the negatives of signing Krug?
...Bad Defensively, age, small (height & weight & reach) , 5on5, PP specialist, UFA Big $ & Term, Shattenkirk-esque signing, not physical etc.

This screams buyer beware. If he was the final piece on a contender, then maybe yes, but a big no for me (& I like Krug), just not the right fit/time. Need a better 2-way guy.

Where does this "bad defensively" come from?

PP specialist = Best PP QB in the league. I liked those years when we had those guys of players. We did win. Krug is carbon copy of Brian Rafalski.

Great transition player makes us play less in our own and and that also makes us better defensively, when we exhaust our guys less in the own end. Basic things in hockey team building. Krug would make us definitely better, not worse.

Stop being scared about everything and build the team better here and there. One-by-one. In every postition, roles and nice mix of players.

We need better players overall and if some free asset likes to join the team, you sign him. Period. Would be foolish, totally foolish, not to sign him.

***

McIsaac is pretty fine for our situation. Nemeth looks good and DeKeyser is fine too. If they lose some games, McIsaac can get some taste in, and be mostly at Griffins. Plays same role in the future as those guys currently. Krug would be the left-side offensive dynamo paired with defensive righty. Nemeth and DeKeyser would need to paired with offensive righties like Hronek and Seider. That mix would start looking pretty good.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NickH8

waltdetroit

Registered User
Jul 20, 2010
2,649
526
Funny The author states "The main reason the Zadina pick would be considered as a mistake is the simple fact that the Detroit Red Wings have plenty of forward prospects in the form of Joe Veleno, Evgeny Svechnikov, Taro Hirose, and Ryan Kuffner "
Well, Joe was taken after Z in the draft, and Taro & Ryan signed the following year. The DRW didn't know they would have these players
 

Henkka

Registered User
Jan 31, 2004
31,187
12,166
Tampere, Finland
Funny The author states "The main reason the Zadina pick would be considered as a mistake is the simple fact that the Detroit Red Wings have plenty of forward prospects in the form of Joe Veleno, Evgeny Svechnikov, Taro Hirose, and Ryan Kuffner "
Well, Joe was taken after Z in the draft, and Taro & Ryan signed the following year. The DRW didn't know they would have these players

Just wonder where did that Krug-quote disappered, and it took that Zadina-link.

All that Krug-analyze about his situation was carbon copy from this The Athletic article.

Torey Krug, future Red Wing? Opinions vary on the...
 
  • Like
Reactions: waltdetroit

Retire91

Stevey Y you our Guy
May 31, 2010
6,162
1,580
It's very likely that Krug is going to seek top pairing money especially on a team like the Red Wings. And his last long term contract in the NHL. I just feel like its a bad fit for the redwings. I see him as a specialist defenseman with 5v5 limitations. Do we really want to lock up a power play specialist to a number 1 D pay for the next 5,6,7 years? If the wings rebuild goes well and we realistically have a deep playoff team in 5-6 years he is going to be 33 years old making top pairing money. This is a hard nope from me.

I realize the players are dying out there with no puck possession and the fans want to see some excitement but we still gotta be smart with our cap space and who "fits" a new core.
 

Steve Yzerlland

Registered User
Jul 18, 2018
8,187
4,027
It's very likely that Krug is going to seek top pairing money especially on a team like the Red Wings. And his last long term contract in the NHL. I just feel like its a bad fit for the redwings. I see him as a specialist defenseman with 5v5 limitations. Do we really want to lock up a power play specialist to a number 1 D pay for the next 5,6,7 years? If the wings rebuild goes well and we realistically have a deep playoff team in 5-6 years he is going to be 33 years old making top pairing money. This is a hard nope from me.

I realize the players are dying out there with no puck possession and the fans want to see some excitement but we still gotta be smart with our cap space and who "fits" a new core.
Krug seems like a "over-the-top signing" if we were a contender not a building block for a rebuild.
 
  • Like
Reactions: decaguard

deca guard

Registered User
Jun 22, 2019
6,171
4,218
www.reddit.com
to me safest bet on ufa 2020 is lehner who'd be 29 then . a goalie can still have alot of prime seasons left that age . and i want to start being competetive next season , yes we wont get far but making playoffs ( without spending long term cap space beyond young long term players such as mantha n tuzzi ) boost organization morale and starts the upward swing . and lehner as our starter with fellow swede larson as his back up could be a real good set up that we take right into contending 2021/22 if our current prospects pan out + sign a ufa star at some point + draft a star next draft .
 

Heaton

Moderator
Feb 13, 2004
22,548
925
Auburn Hills
Krug seems like a "over-the-top signing" if we were a contender not a building block for a rebuild.

To me, Krug seems like a guy you can really benefit from to help the young offensive players be able to actually use their offensive skills. We don't have anyone in the organization who can effectively QB a PP or show any of the kids what to do with the puck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winger98 and Henkka

Zetterberg4Captain

Registered User
Aug 11, 2009
13,789
2,167
Detroit
Still need: 2C, 1G, 2RW (RHS), 1D, maybe 2D (Hronek likely fills this role).


Key word is almost...

But krug, hronek, seider, cholo, dekeyser is a solid dcorps moving forward

Larkin, byfield, valeno, ras
Hall, mantha, svech, perlini
Zadina, bert, fabbri, erne
Is a solid forward group moving forward

We would be "almost" ready to start turning things around
 

Steve Yzerlland

Registered User
Jul 18, 2018
8,187
4,027
Key word is almost...

But krug, hronek, seider, cholo, dekeyser is a solid dcorps moving forward

Larkin, byfield, valeno, ras
Hall, mantha, svech, perlini
Zadina, bert, fabbri, erne
Is a solid forward group moving forward

We would be "almost" ready to start turning things around
No that's not "almost" ready. And what did you get for AA ,nothing?
 

Gniwder

Registered User
Oct 12, 2009
14,276
7,607
Bellingham, WA
Key word is almost...

But krug, hronek, seider, cholo, dekeyser is a solid dcorps moving forward

Larkin, byfield, valeno, ras
Hall, mantha, svech, perlini
Zadina, bert, fabbri, erne
Is a solid forward group moving forward

We would be "almost" ready to start turning things around
That D looks as soft as warm butter.
 

saska sault

Registered User
Jun 5, 2010
3,812
2,923
Sault Ste. Marie
Win byfield
Sign hall
Sign krug
Trade AA
Rebuild almost done

Even then.. Don't think we are done. We still miss the playoffs IMO with that team. Who's our #2 center? Cholo, Hronek and Krug.. Not much grit on the back end. Who's stopping the pucks? Plus when our young guys need big pay days and you got 18-20 million invested in free agents.. You gotta let your home grown talent go?
 

Ghost of Ethan Hunt

The Official Ghost of Space Ghosts Monkey
Jun 23, 2018
8,733
5,092
Top Secret Moon Base
That D looks as soft as warm butter.
That's the Parkay Defense...Because "I Can't Believe It's Not Butter"


iu
 

The Zetterberg Era

Ball Hockey Sucks
Nov 8, 2011
40,977
11,604
Ft. Myers, FL
It's very likely that Krug is going to seek top pairing money especially on a team like the Red Wings. And his last long term contract in the NHL. I just feel like its a bad fit for the redwings. I see him as a specialist defenseman with 5v5 limitations. Do we really want to lock up a power play specialist to a number 1 D pay for the next 5,6,7 years? If the wings rebuild goes well and we realistically have a deep playoff team in 5-6 years he is going to be 33 years old making top pairing money. This is a hard nope from me.

I realize the players are dying out there with no puck possession and the fans want to see some excitement but we still gotta be smart with our cap space and who "fits" a new core.

Krug plays a very cerebral game, I think this would be a lot more like when we stole Rafalski. Is he a PP specialist sure, but he is actually the driver of the number #1 PP in Boston. He is the guy that makes that thing really hum, it is impressive. He plays a game that should age pretty well, we shall see. But he would help this group.

Still without a little lottery luck it might be too soon in the process. Yzerman has to balance that decision while he evaluates the team he wants to build. He will have a feeling we should also see decent indicators in his handling of Mantha, Bert and AA. But Krug on the Trouba deal is an impact player for us, assuming he starts appropriating the money correctly as it comes off the cap is what you're concerned with. But we would enter the UFA process with a known draft slot, do you feel better about the Wings build with Lafrainiere or Byfield, even Raymond is pretty special though I want one of the big two for sure this year. Just stinks the way the lottery is setup when you're this bad, you might not even get the rewards you should. Is what it is, just stinks when you're going through it.
 

RedHawkDown

still trying to trust the yzerplan
Aug 26, 2011
4,415
4,940
Canada
I think we should only be signing UFAs if we win one of Laf or Byfield. Anything else and we're just treading water. One of those two + some big-time UFAs, and suddenly we're talking.

Hall-Byfield-Zadina
Bert-Larkin-Mantha
Svech-Ras-Fabbri

hell of a top 9. Of course this assumes Z becomes at least a serviceable top 6'er and Svech/Ras become good 3rd line options but I don't think those things are too much to ask. If not, one of Mastro/Berggren/Veleno probably turns into a top 9 player at least.

Krug-Hronek and Cholo-Seider would be a fine top 4 in 2 years. That team is definitely at least making the playoffs, if not contending. But it hinges on getting that top 2-3 pick elite game-changing talent.
 
Last edited:

Winger98

Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
22,809
4,663
Cleveland
I think we should only be signing UFAs if we win one of Laf or Byfield. Anything else and we're just treading water. One of those two + some big-time UFAs, and suddenly we're talking.

Hall-Byfield-Zadina
Bert-Larkin-Mantha
Svech-Ras-Fabbri

hell of a top 9. Of course this assumes Z becomes at least a serviceable top 6'er and Svech/Ras become good 3rd line options but I don't think those things are too much to ask. If not, one of Mastro/Berggren/Veleno probably turns into a top 9 player at least.

Krug-Hronek and Cholo-Seider would be a fine top 9 in 2 years. That team is definitely at least making the playoffs, if not contending. But it hinges on getting that top 2-3 pick elite game-changing talent.

Yeah, it gets harder justifying trying to add that big name UFA if we aren't bringing home one of the top picks. At the same time, the Wings might never get the top pick and at some point they are going to have to decide if they've reached the point where they need to start supplementing the talent they have with some outside help. The decision would be easier if Larsson starts putting up some better numbers in GR and we know we might have that goalie spot locked down a bit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Zetterberg Era

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad