Speculation: According to Mirtle/Siegel Leafs were trying the sign Derek Ryan on July 1st.

ninetyone

Registered User
Jul 12, 2018
122
62
I listened to that podcast as well. Jonas was pretty clear that he'd heard the Ryan rumours AND that Dubas told Ryan's agent that IF they didn't get Tavares, they wanted him. Gotta love the clarity/openness in communication from Dubas - I know he's golden-boy and it's overdone (and annoys other fan bases to no end), but this is a special executive the Leafs have.

I also don't think deHaan makes Gardiner expendable.

I think it's as simple as asset accumulation/management as @AppsSyl mentioned earlier in the thread.

I'm sure there's a lot of dialog between Babcock and Dubas but I doubt Dubas has ANY SAY on who plays where, I think that's ALL Babs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ricky Bobby

Brown Dog

Registered User
Jun 23, 2007
5,733
4,867
I think OP raises some interesting questions. Specifically, I'm very curious to see what Dubas has in mind for Gardiner.

I can't imagine an asset management guy like Dubas is keen on seeing Gardiner walk for nothing as a UFA next year--especially after losing JVR, Bozak, Komarov, and Polak that way this year. But Garinder is almost certain to be a cap casualty unless he is willing to add in for less than market value.

So a trade is coming? But we need Gardiner for this year. And I can't see Dubas being content with futures when our D needs help ad it is with Gardiner.

If Gardiner was willing to take a discount to stay, wouldn't they have a deal done by now? Makes you wonder if Dubas is shopping Gardiner hard for another defender--maybe one who is signed reasonably beyond this coming year?
 
  • Like
Reactions: heybuddyhowyadoing

jrgtml67

Registered User
Sep 12, 2011
5,457
945
Lol..these fantasy lines are hilarious. All centers on one line ?

The PP will start..

Matthew's, JT, Hyman, Marner, Rielly

Nylander, Kadri, Marleau, Brown, Gardiner.

I suspect theyll try Marner with JT and Babs likes 2 centers on each PP unit. Hyman puck hound or put Marleau their (1st unit). Second one you have 2 faceoff guys Nylander, Kadri, Marleau the point man passer Brown puck hound and Jake. Or they keep Matthew's unit from last yr and go

Jt Kadri Marner Brown Jake/Rielly.
 

jrgtml67

Registered User
Sep 12, 2011
5,457
945
I think OP raises some interesting questions. Specifically, I'm very curious to see what Dubas has in mind for Gardiner.

I can't imagine an asset management guy like Dubas is keen on seeing Gardiner walk for nothing as a UFA next year--especially after losing JVR, Bozak, Komarov, and Polak that way this year. But Garinder is almost certain to be a cap casualty unless he is willing to add in for less than market value.

So a trade is coming? But we need Gardiner for this year. And I can't see Dubas being content with futures when our D needs help ad it is with Gardiner.

If Gardiner was willing to take a discount to stay, wouldn't they have a deal done by now? Makes you wonder if Dubas is shopping Gardiner hard for another defender--maybe one who is signed reasonably beyond this coming year?

Why? Hes an RFA (Jake) no rush there. Also look at him and Riellys totals over 2 seasons Jake is better slightly due to super plus minus in 2016 2017.

Jake is way way better than most think. If he played on any other team we would be saying to trade for him. But when you watch a lot of games hes a finger nail biting guy to watch. He either makes a magical long pass or makes a huge mistake. Babcock said it best...hes real good sometimes you just scratch your head.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darcy Tucker

rent free

Registered User
Apr 6, 2015
20,427
6,114
Nylander would only play center if the leafs didn't sign a top 9 center, so signing Ryan instead of Tavares would have meant nylander plays on the wing, like he will be this upcoming season.

I don't think Gardiner would have been on the trading block if the leafs signed de haan. The leafs defense needs to be upgraded and trading gardener after signing Calvin would have left the leafs with a hole in their top 4, like they has this past season and coming into this season. If they signed him it's to strengthen the blue line, not to replace someone who the team views as valuable.

Apparently Ryan is like bozak. He puts up points but is weak defensively.
 

indigobuffalo

Portage and Main
Feb 10, 2011
6,790
559
Winnipeg MB
Gardiner is coming off a 50+ point season.

Why on Earth would Dubas want to trade him?

GMs are tasked with making decisions based on the big picture. Not a single game 7 performance.

Gardiner isn’t a choke artist either. He’s had big clutch performances in make-or-break games.

Just accept that he is staying...
 

skacore

Registered User
Nov 7, 2010
3,198
174
I've only ever heard Dubas praise Gardiner, I really doubt he's as available as some of you seem to think.
 

Sypher04

Registered User
Jan 20, 2011
11,525
9,748
I think you have to try your damndest to convince Gardiner to take in the ballpark of Rielly money.

I don't think it happens, but that's gotten be the play.
 

ottomaddox

Registered User
Oct 31, 2017
10,592
4,600
Toronto
Why? Hes an RFA (Jake) no rush there. Also look at him and Riellys totals over 2 seasons Jake is better slightly due to super plus minus in 2016 2017.

Jake is way way better than most think. If he played on any other team we would be saying to trade for him. But when you watch a lot of games hes a finger nail biting guy to watch. He either makes a magical long pass or makes a huge mistake. Babcock said it best...hes real good sometimes you just scratch your head.

What? Gardiner is a UFA working towards his *1st UFA contract. He'll be 29 years old next July. He'll want to be paid. He'd be a fool to take less from TOR.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: kb

ottomaddox

Registered User
Oct 31, 2017
10,592
4,600
Toronto
Gardiner is coming off a 50+ point season.

Why on Earth would Dubas want to trade him?

GMs are tasked with making decisions based on the big picture. Not a single game 7 performance.

Gardiner isn’t a choke artist either. He’s had big clutch performances in make-or-break games.

Just accept that he is staying...

You talk as though some of us are only referring to a game 7 performance. Jake Gardiner has a body of work that is as inconsistent as they come. Big nights/bad nights/super soft - that is Jake Gardiner.

Perhaps there's a slim possibility that Dubas was hoping to sign De Haan and play him in the right side. I just don't know what else this means other then TOR moving on from Jake Gardiner.
 

ShaneFalco

Registered User
Jul 15, 2012
21,414
15,770
London, On
Gardiner is coming off a 50+ point season.

Why on Earth would Dubas want to trade him?

GMs are tasked with making decisions based on the big picture. Not a single game 7 performance.

Gardiner isn’t a choke artist either. He’s had big clutch performances in make-or-break games.

Just accept that he is staying...

I don't want to pay Gardiner 6+ on a long term deal - do you?
 

Erndog

Registered User
Jul 17, 2007
4,092
1,525
If they got CDH, could have even flipped Rielly over to right side (as he has played in the past and several suggestions out there).

CDH-Rielly
Gardiner-Zaitsev
Dermott-Hainsey

May have been a thing.
 

X66

114-110
Aug 18, 2008
13,577
7,444
This reminds me when we were interviewing Boucher, and got Babcock instead.
 

Clark4Ever

What we do in hockey echoes in eternity...
Oct 10, 2010
11,580
8,168
T.O.
Any astute management team should always have a contingency plan in place.
 

Isaac Nootin

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
7,590
11,899
Title is false. The Leafs were not trying to sign Derek Ryan July 1st as they already knew Tavares was committed and were in the process of working out a contract.
 

ottomaddox

Registered User
Oct 31, 2017
10,592
4,600
Toronto
Title is false. The Leafs were not trying to sign Derek Ryan July 1st as they already knew Tavares was committed and were in the process of working out a contract.

Not sure what this means. Why would Ryan's name even be mentioned if there wasn't a point to be made. It's true that signing Derek Ryan never happened, but the point they were making was that plan 1A shifted once Tavares was signed.
 

Jmo89

Registered User
Mar 21, 2010
4,342
3,832
You talk as though some of us are only referring to a game 7 performance. Jake Gardiner has a body of work that is as inconsistent as they come. Big nights/bad nights/super soft - that is Jake Gardiner.

Perhaps there's a slim possibility that Dubas was hoping to sign De Haan and play him in the right side. I just don't know what else this means other then TOR moving on from Jake Gardiner.

Personally I think the interest in CDH means Dubas was more likely to keep Gardiner. I think the preference is to have Rielly, Gardiner, and Dermott on the left, but if you were able to get CDH for free (only cap) then maybe you consider moving one of them to the right for a couple seasons until you either find a better dman in free agency or through trade.

Free is free, and I'd argue it's better to keep assets and move a dman to his offside than it is to lose assets and gain an rhd - assuming the dman being acquired is your basic top 4 guy and not a stud (in which case giving up assets is probably better.)

We will probably be seeing this defence for at least one more year unless an opportunistic trade comes along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heybuddyhowyadoing

Brown Dog

Registered User
Jun 23, 2007
5,733
4,867
Why? Hes an RFA (Jake) no rush there. Also look at him and Riellys totals over 2 seasons Jake is better slightly due to super plus minus in 2016 2017.

Jake is way way better than most think. If he played on any other team we would be saying to trade for him. But when you watch a lot of games hes a finger nail biting guy to watch. He either makes a magical long pass or makes a huge mistake. Babcock said it best...hes real good sometimes you just scratch your head.

I love Jake! I just don't see how we can afford him after next year if he wants a fair market contract. He'll be UFA.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad